Purpose: The Comprehensive Basic Science Examination (CBSE) scores have significant effects on the applications of oral-maxillofacial surgery (OMS) residency candidates. However, a comparison of the scores of residents that match to 4-year versus 6-year programs is lacking. The present study compared the CBSE scores of OMS residency candidates who had matched to 4-year and 6-year tracks in the 2018-2019 application cycle.

Materials And Methods: In the present cross-sectional analysis, an anonymous questionnaire was sent electronically to program directors of all OMS residency programs in the United States using the online survey engine Survey Monkey. Data were collected on the CBSE scores of their postgraduate year 1 categorical residents and whether the resident was on a 4-year or 6-year track. The CBSE scores were summarized overall and by the type of residency program (4 vs 6 year) using the mean, standard deviation, median, mode, minimum, and maximum. In addition, the 2-sample t test was used to compare the mean CBSE score between the 4-year programs (4YPs) and 6-year programs (6YPs).

Results: A total of 37 scores were received from the 4YPs and 31 from the 6YPs. The overall mean CBSE score was 68.9. Using the 2-sample t test, the mean CBSE score differed significantly between the 4YPs and 6YPs (t = -6.59; df = 66; P < .0001).

Conclusions: Candidates matching into 6-year positions showed significantly higher mean scores on the CBSE examination compared with those matching into 4-year positions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cbse scores
16
oms residency
12
cbse score
12
comprehensive basic
8
basic science
8
science examination
8
4-year versus
8
versus 6-year
8
oral-maxillofacial surgery
8
residency candidates
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Anki is an application that capitalizes upon the techniques of spaced repetition and is increasingly utilized by medical students for examination preparation. This study examines the impact of Anki usage in a medical school curriculum on academic performance. Secondary objectives analyzed individual Anki utilization and a qualitative assessment of Anki use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The impact of clinical proficiency on individual student scores on the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Examinations remains uncertain. We hypothesised that increasing the length of time spent in a clinical environment would augment students' performance.

Methods: Performance on the NBME Subject Examination in Internal Medicine (NBME-IM) of three student cohorts was observed longitudinally.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background:  A learner transitions from being a primary learner to an adolescent learner and further to an adult learner in his/her academic life. The learners exhibit specific learning behaviors at all stages of learning, the mapping of which is required for optimization of learning.

Primary Objective:  To assess the product-centered learning behaviors in adolescent and adult learners using a validated learning behavior questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: In 2007, University of Texas Health Science Center Houston School of Public Health at San Antonio (UTHealth SPH) and UT Health San Antonio Long School of Medicine (LSOM) designed and implemented a 4-year dual MD and Master of Public Health (MPH) program. Dual MD-MPH programs wherein students can receive both degrees within 4 years are unique, and programmatic evaluation may have generalizable implications for accredited MD-MPH programs.

Method: Demographic information was collected from UTHealth SPH and LSOM student data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medical Student Progress Examination Performance and Its Relationship With Metacognition, Critical Thinking, and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies.

Acad Med

February 2021

D. Solomon is professor emeritus, Department of Medicine and Office of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3130-5240 .

Purpose: Metacognition and critical thinking are essential for academic success. The relationship between these components and medical student learning, as assessed with progress examinations, informs curriculum development and efforts to ensure learning progression of all students. This study assessed learning mechanisms by modeling medical students' progress test performance longitudinally at Michigan State University College of Human Medicine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!