Of 100 cases of acute myocardial infarction as shown on autopsy, 55 cases were transmural infarcts and 45 were subendocardial. Pathologic Q waves appeared in 67% of the cases of transmural infarct and in 30% of subendocardial infarct. In transmural infarcts, Q wave infarcts occurred twice as frequently as non-Q wave infarcts. In the cases of subendocardial infarcts just the opposite was observed: non-Q wave infarcts had double the frequency of Q wave infarcts. In spite of this, when a myocardial infarct is characterized strictly by electrocardiology, it should be described by only the accurate terminology of Q wave infarct or non-Q wave infarct. To distinguish with certitude between subendocardial infarct and transmural myocardial infarct on the basis of the ECG does not seem possible. Q wave infarct as "transmural" and non-Q wave infarct as "subendocardial" does not correspond to the pathologic evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0736(88)90109-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-q wave
20
wave infarcts
16
wave infarct
16
wave
10
infarct
9
100 cases
8
myocardial infarction
8
cases transmural
8
transmural infarcts
8
subendocardial infarct
8

Similar Publications

A generation ago thrombolytic therapy led to a paradigm shift in myocardial infarction (MI), from Q-wave/non-Q-wave to ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) vs non-STEMI. Using STE on the electrocardiogram (ECG) as a surrogate marker for acute coronary occlusion (ACO) allowed for rapid diagnosis and treatment. But the vast research catalyzed by the STEMI paradigm has revealed increasing anomalies: 25% of "non-STEMI" have ACO with delayed reperfusion and higher mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The Disrupt CAD IV study, which enrolled patients with severe coronary artery calcification, reported strong initial safety (6.3% major cardiac events) and effectiveness (93.8% procedural success) results.
  • Two years after treatment, low rates of major adverse events were observed, including 12.6% experiencing complications like heart attacks and no instances of stent thrombosis, indicating that IVL remained a safe and effective choice for these patients in Japan.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Invasive versus Conservative Management in Coronary Artery Disease.

Clin Med Res

June 2023

Chief Science Officer, Scientific Director of Cardiovascular Research Institute, Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, California; Professor of Medicine (Clinical Scholar), Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, immediate coronary angiography and intervention is the best practice, if an experienced laboratory is available. In non-Q-wave infarction most, but not all, studies suggest that early invasive strategy is superior to conservative management. Complete revascularization is preferred.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Myocarditis is an uncommon disease in children with potentially fatal consequences. An electrocardiogram (ECG) change seen in myocarditis is pathological Q wave. Pathological Q wave is linked to permanent damage and myocardial death in several cardiac diseases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!