A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Pre-operative hormone stimulation in hypospadias repair: A facilitator or a confounder. | LitMetric

Introduction: Preoperative hormone stimulation (PHS) is popular in hypospadias reconstructive surgery. While still controversial, it is performed to have a more developed gross anatomy of the glans and penis for improvement of the surgical condition and outcome.

Objective: In this study we assessed morphometric and histologic effects of pre-operative testosterone therapy on the penis and prepuce in patients with hypospadias.

Study Design: 18 patients with hypospadias who received 3 monthly doses of 25 mg testosterone injections were compared with 23 patients with hypospadias who were managed without pre-operative androgen therapy. Penile morphometry and hormone side effects were assessed in monthly pre-operative visits. Intra operative observations and preputial histopathology were also compared between the groups.

Results: Glans diameter enlarged significantly after the first dose of testosterone. (P < 0.001) while morphologic changes were not significant by further injections. 72.2% showed one or more hormone related side effects that were mostly mild. Severe side effects such as thick pubic hair growth, frequent erections or considerable penis hyper-sensation were observed in 27.8%. Glans to corpus ratio was 0.2 ± 0.75 in PHS group compare to 0.3 ± 0.17 in control group. (P < 0.001). Hemorrhage needing tourniquet placement was reported in 44.4% of the PHS patients compared to 26.1% among the control group. Histopathologic studies revealed increased vascularity and less inflammation of the prepuce in PHS group compared to controls.

Discussion: The glans and penis enlargement wasn't significant in 22.2% of patients who underwent PHS. We identified the first dose of testosterone as the most effective one. This finding supports the idea of close clinical monitoring to stop PHS when a significant response is observed and the expected goals are reached. Androgen side effects were not uncommon among our patients although they were mainly mild. Intraoperative assessments showed a decreased glans wing thickness to corporal body ratio in PHS group compared to controls. This finding caused more complex glanuloplasty while wrapping the glans wings over neo urethra and enlarged corporal bodies.

Conclusion: We suggest limiting PHS to carefully selected cases considering the observed anatomical and histological changes and the side effects. Monthly monitoring during PHS is recommended to stop androgen therapy as soon as the minimum defined targets are reached. This may decrease the rate of androgen side effects while providing better surgical conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.04.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hormone stimulation
8
patients hypospadias
8
pre-operative
4
pre-operative hormone
4
hypospadias
4
stimulation hypospadias
4
hypospadias repair
4
repair facilitator
4
facilitator confounder
4
confounder introduction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!