A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Variability of relationship between the volume scattering function at 180° and the backscattering coefficient for aquatic particles. | LitMetric

Properly interpreting lidar (light detection and ranging) signal for characterizing particle distribution relies on a key parameter, (), which relates the particulate volume scattering function (VSF) at 180° (()) that a lidar measures to the particulate backscattering coefficient (). However, () has been seldom studied due to challenges in accurately measuring () and concurrently in the field. In this study, (), as well as its spectral dependence, was re-examined using the VSFs measured in situ at high angular resolution in a wide range of waters. (), while not measured directly, was inferred using a physically sound, well-validated VSF-inversion method. The effects of particle shape and internal structure on the inversion were tested using three inversion kernels consisting of phase functions computed for particles that are assumed as homogenous sphere, homogenous asymmetric hexahedra, or coated sphere. The reconstructed VSFs using any of the three kernels agreed well with the measured VSFs with a mean percentage difference <5 at scattering angles <170. At angles immediately near or equal to 180°, the reconstructed () depends strongly on the inversion kernel. () derived with the sphere kernels was smaller than those derived with the hexahedra kernel but consistent with () estimated directly from high-spectral-resolution lidar and in situ backscattering sensor. The possible explanation was that the sphere kernels are able to capture the backscattering enhancement feature near 180° that has been observed for marine particles. () derived using the coated sphere kernel was generally lower than those derived with the homogenous sphere kernel. Our result suggests that () is sensitive to the shape and internal structure of particles and significant error could be induced if a fixed value of () is to be used to interpret lidar signal collected in different waters. On the other hand, () showed little spectral dependence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.383229DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

volume scattering
8
scattering function
8
backscattering coefficient
8
variability relationship
4
relationship volume
4
function 180°
4
180° backscattering
4
coefficient aquatic
4
aquatic particles
4
particles properly
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!