A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Flexural Performance of Direct Resin Composite Restorative Materials Past Expiration Date. | LitMetric

Objective:  This study' s purpose was to examine the flexural properties of five direct restorative resin composites stored up to 30 months after the expiration date.

Materials And Methods:  Ambient-stored materials had pre-expiration date baseline flexure strength values as per ISO 4049 ( = 20). All materials were used per manufacturer guidelines, photopolymerized on both sides using a LED-based visible light curing unit, and stored in 0.2M phosphate buffered saline. At 24 hours, specimens were stressed to failure in three-point bend at a 0.5 mm/min cross head speed. Additional samples were made at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, and 30 months past expiration date. Young's modulus (flexural) was ascertained using the linear slope of the stress-stain curve.

Statistical Analysis:  The mean data was found to contain a non-normal distribution and irregular variance which was compared using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's posthoc testing.Also, Pearson's correlation analysis was used to identify possible similar degradation behavior between products within both flexure strength and modulus determinations. A 95% level of confidence (α = 0.05) was used.

Results:  Materials maintained similar to baseline flexure strength and modulus for up to 15 months past expiration date with two materials being similar at 30 months. However, clinicians were still advised to follow expiration dates, as resin composite degradation mechanisms are complex and vital constituents might degrade that are not overtly identified by clinical handling characteristics. No dental shelf life standards exist and manufacturers are requested to provide protocol information used in determining shelf life expiration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274831PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709922DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

months expiration
12
flexure strength
12
resin composite
8
baseline flexure
8
strength modulus
8
shelf life
8
expiration
6
flexural performance
4
performance direct
4
direct resin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!