Background: A randomised phase II trial demonstrated that the addition of olaratumab to doxorubicin significantly increased overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) compared to doxorubicin alone. The recently presented phase III study of doxorubicin and olaratumab in advanced soft tissue sarcoma was discordant with this finding.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with advanced-/metastatic STS treated with at least two cycles of doxorubicin and olaratumab at eight sarcoma units across England and Northern Ireland between May 2017 and March 2019.

Results: 172 patients were evaluable and 40 patients (23.3%) had died at the time of analysis. Median ECOG performance status (PS) was 1. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months (95% CI 5.9-7.7 months). Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological subtype (75 patients, 43.6%), followed by liposarcomas (19, 11.0%). The mean number of cycles was 5 (doxorubicin range 2-6; olaratumab range 2-23). Two patients (1.2%) had a complete response and 34 (19.8%) had a partial response. 79 (45.9%) had stable and 58 (33.7%) progressive disease. 57 patients (33.1%) experienced grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 7 patients (4.1%) grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia. Grade ≥ 3 anaemia was seen in 21 patients (12.2%). Grade ≥ 3 non-haematological toxicities were seen in 35 patients (20.3%). A clinically significant drop in left ventricular ejection fraction was seen in 6 patients (3.5%). 48 patients (27.9%) required a dose reduction. Overall survival (OS) is pending.

Conclusions: Our results are in keeping with the phase III study findings: response rate, PFS and OS were similar to those reported in the phase III ANNOUNCE trial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203838PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13569-020-00131-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

doxorubicin olaratumab
12
soft tissue
12
patients
12
phase iii
12
tissue sarcomas
8
england northern
8
northern ireland
8
advanced soft
8
iii study
8
cycles doxorubicin
8

Similar Publications

What are the Optimal Systemic Treatment Options for Rhabdomyosarcoma?

Curr Treat Options Oncol

June 2024

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-Machi, Kanazawa, 920-8640, Japan.

Article Synopsis
  • - Rhabdomyosarcoma is a type of soft tissue cancer often found in children that requires a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation for treatment, but outcomes are less favorable for advanced cases.
  • - The current standard chemotherapy includes drugs like vincristine and actinomycin D, but new treatments like immune checkpoint inhibitors are showing promise in improving outcomes in other cancers and should be investigated for rhabdomyosarcoma as well.
  • - Recent studies have identified potential new combinations of drugs, such as temozolomide with vincristine or irinotecan, and new therapeutic targets that need further research to evaluate their effectiveness for treating rhabdomyosarcoma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This exploratory analysis evaluated the tumor samples of the patients treated with doxorubicin (with or without olaratumab) in a negative phase III ANNOUNCE trial to better understand the complexity of advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and to potentially identify its predictive markers.

Experimental Design: RNA sequencing was performed on pretreatment tumor samples (n = 273) from the ANNOUNCE trial to evaluate response patterns and identify potential predictive treatment markers for doxorubicin. A BOR-associated signature to doxorubicin (REDSARC) was created by evaluating tumors with radiographic response versus progression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: Currently, the only systemic therapy approved for advanced leiomyosarcoma is Doxorubicin-based monotherapy. Despite disappointing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), no combination therapy has formally ever proven to be more effective. In this clinical setting, selecting the most efficient therapy is key, as most patients become quickly symptomatic with poor performance status.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including health-related quality of life, are recommended to be routinely collected in clinical trials, but data are limited from trials of sarcoma patients. In this analysis, pooled PRO data are reported from patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) enrolled to the ANNOUNCE phase III trial of doxorubicin-based therapy.

Methods: ANNOUNCE was a phase III trial that randomized 509 patients with STS to receive up to eight cycles of doxorubicin with olaratumab or placebo, followed by single-agent olaratumab or placebo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!