To determine if scores of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT12) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) correlate with one another in hip pain patients. Patients reporting to an orthopedic clinic for their scheduled appointment for hip pain were given a paper survey consisting of the iHOT12 and the HOS. Demographic information [age, weight, height and body mass index (BMI)] was obtained by chart review. Overall, 114 patients were invited to voluntarily complete the surveys of which 23 declined. Our sample consisted of 91 (57 female and 34 male) patients (80% response rate). The HOS (iHOT12) explained 62% of the variation in iHOT12 (HOS) by using a linear model (Pearson's correlation() is 0.79, < 0.001). Age, weight, BMI, gender and arthritis did not show a statistically significant predictive power explaining HOS. However, only gender had a 'statistically' significant predictive power explaining iHOT12 ( = 0.007). The relationship between the two scores are stronger for males ( = 0.81, < 0.001) compared with females ( = 0.77, < 0.001). The proportion of variations explained on one of the scores by the other are 0.66 for males and 0.59 for females. HOS score together with gender explained 64% of the variation in iHOT12 by using a linear model. iHOT12 together with the non-statistically significant gender term explained 62% of the variation in HOS by using a linear model. It may not be necessary to collect both the iHOT12 and HOS, since the predictive power of one on the other is high. Collecting HOS together with information on gender is preferable compared with collecting iHOT12. : Level III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7195934 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnaa002 | DOI Listing |
Arthroscopy
January 2025
American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Chicago, IL 60018; American Hip Institute, Chicago, IL 60018. Electronic address:
Purpose: To identify the PASS and SCB thresholds for hip arthroscopy and provide guidance on how to choose among the thresholds.
Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted in PubMed and MEDLINE databases in August 2024 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Studies with Level I to IV evidence that defined SCB or PASS thresholds for PROs for hip arthroscopy in the setting of intra-articular pathology were included.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg
December 2024
From the School of Medicine (Sang and Niknam), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Swarup), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Introduction: Historically, for hip procedures, the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) and the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) have been commonly usedas instruments for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, these tools are often influenced by other factors, such as concurrent illnesses, making more standardized tools a preferable choice. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-25 (PROMIS-25) is a standardized, validated PROMs metric that has correlated well with several other anatomy-specific PROMs tools.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Surg
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Orthop J Sports Med
November 2024
Section of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Medical College of Rush University, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background: Clinically significant outcome (CSO) thresholds are invaluable to the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is gaining popularity among the orthopaedic community; however, CSO thresholds for PROMIS are yet to be defined for outcomes after gluteus medius and/or minimus (GM) repair.
Purpose: To (1) define CSO thresholds for PROMIS-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) and PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) after GM repair, (2) correlate these PROMIS scores with legacy hip-specific PROs, and (3) quantify their floor and ceiling effects.
Bone Jt Open
October 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scott and White Health, McKinney, Texas, USA.
Aims: The Single Assessment Numerical Evalution (SANE) score is a pragmatic alternative to longer patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity of the SANE and hip-specific PROMs in a generalized population of patients with hip pain at a single timepoint upon initial visit with an orthopaedic surgeon who is a hip preservation specialist. We hypothesized that SANE would have a strong correlation with the 12-question International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT)-12, the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), and the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), providing evidence for concurrent validity of the SANE and hip-specific outcome measures in patients with hip pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!