A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 177

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 177
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 251
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1037
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3155
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Is It Time to Replace the Oswestry Index With PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test? | LitMetric

Is It Time to Replace the Oswestry Index With PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test?

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Pain Medicine Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Published: September 2020

Objective: To address the relative influence of psychological factors on variation in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI) scores.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: We enrolled patients with low back pain, presenting to clinicians specializing in the treatment of spine conditions in a large urban area.

Participants: New and return English-speaking patients (N=116).

Main Outcome Measures: The PF CAT and ODI.

Methods: Patients completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale short form, Patient Health Questionnaire short form (PHQ-2), Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire short form (PSEQ-2), PROMIS PF CAT and ODI on a secure tablet.

Results: The 95% CI for the amount of variation in PROMIS PF CAT scores (95% CI, 0.06-0.31) accounted for by psychological measures overlapped with the 95% CI for the amount of variation in ODI scores (CI, 0.26-0.53). PROMIS PF CAT had a strong correlation with ODI (r=-0.69; P<.001). Greater PROMIS PF CAT scores were independently associated with fewer symptoms of depression (β=-1.6; 95% CI, -2.7 to -0.58; P=.003). Higher ODI scores were independently associated with more catastrophic thinking (β=1.2; 95% CI, 0.60-1.88; P<.001) and less self-efficacy (β=-2.4; 95% CI, -3.2 to -1.5; P<.001). PSEQ-2 accounted for the largest proportion of variation in ODI. PHQ-2 accounted for the largest proportion of variation in PROMIS PF CAT. Psychological measures explained more variation in ODI (semipartial R=0.48 for psychological measures; adjusted R full model=0.49) than in PROMIS PF CAT (semipartial R=0.17 for psychological measures; adjusted R full model=0.31).

Conclusions: The ODI and PROMIS PF CAT are comparably sensitive to psychological factors in patients with persistent lower back pain. Given that the PROMIS PF CAT is more efficient to administer, clinicians might consider using PROMIS PF CAT when assessing physical limitations in patients with persistent lower back pain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.03.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

short form
12
promis cat
12
promis physical
8
physical function
8
function computer
8
computer adaptive
8
low pain
8
questionnaire short
8
95% amount
8
amount variation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!