[Risk prediction of venous thromboembolism in non-small cell lung cancer patients based on COMPASS-CAT risk assessment model].

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi

General Department, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Published: April 2020

To verify the risk prediction efficacies of COMPASS-cancer associated thrombosis (COMPASS-CAT) risk assessment model and the new prediction probability model established based on COMPASS-CAT for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 373 patients with NSCLC admitted to National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital from March 2013 to June 2017. All of them were divided into VTE group (63 cases) and non-VTE group (310 cases) according to VTE occurred or not. According to the COMPASS-CAT risk assessment model, all patients were scored and classified by risk. Chi-square test was used to compare the clinical features between two groups, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors of VTE in NSCLC patients. Based on the COMPASS-CAT risk assessment model, D-dimer≥1.03 mg/L and hemoglobin<10 g/dl were included to construct a new COMPASS-CAT prediction probability model, the ROC curve was also drawn. We used MedCalc software to compare the difference of ROC curves and analyze the application value of different risk assessment models in predicting VTE risk of NSCLC patients. The incidence of VTE was 16.9% (63/373). The COMPASS-CAT score of VTE group was 6.37±3.40, which was higher than 2.74±2.04 of non-VTE group (<0.001). Univariate analysis showed that the proportion of patients with KPS≤80, COMPASS-CAT≥7, D-dimer≥1.03 mg/L, central venous catheter (CVC), hemoglobin<10 g/L, cardiovascular complications≥2, hyperlipidemia, clinical stages Ⅲ and Ⅳ, KPS≤80 in VTE group was significantly higher than that in non-VTE group (<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that D-dimer≥1.03 mg/L, compass-cat score≥7 and hemoglobin <10 g/dL were independent risk factors for VTE. Based on the COMPASS-CAT risk assessment model, a new risk assessment model of COMPASS-CAT was constructed by incorporating the variables of D-dimer ≥1.03 mg/L and hemoglobin <10 g/dl. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of COMPASS-CAT model and new COMPASS-CAT prediction probability model were 0.745 and 0.804, respectively. Compared with COMPASS-CAT model, AUC of new COMPASS-CAT prediction probability model increased by 0.059, with statistically significant difference(=0.007). COMPASS-CAT risk assessment model can predict the risk of VTE in NSCLC patients, and the new COMPASS-CAT prediction probability model constructed by COMPASS-CAT model combined with D-dimer and hemoglobin variables can improve the accuracy of screening VTE risk factors in NSCLC patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20191101-00707DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compass-cat risk
16
risk assessment
16
based compass-cat
12
assessment model
12
venous thromboembolism
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
lung cancer
8
patients based
8
risk
7

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Khorana, PROTECHT, CONKO, and COMPASS-CAT scores in identifying risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in lung cancer patients.
  • A total of 591 patients were analyzed, with 108 experiencing VTE; results showed that the CONKO score had better discriminatory ability than the Khorana score over both 6 and 12 months.
  • The findings highlight a decrease in the Khorana score's effectiveness over time and suggest the need for further research to validate the CONKO score and the identified risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of the COMPASS-CAT tool in predicting venous thromboembolism (VTE) among cancer patients.

Methods: Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, OVID, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP database from their inception up to April 19, 2023. The quality of studies was appraised using the diagnostic test accuracy study bias assessment tool (QUADAS-2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with lung cancer is relatively high, and risk stratification models are vital for the targeted application of thromboprophylaxis. We aimed to review VTE risk prediction models that have been developed in patients with lung cancer and evaluated their performance.

Methods And Results: Twenty-four eligible studies involving 123,493 patients were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Primary prevention of cancer-associated venous thrombosis: Rationale and challenges in clinical practice.

Curr Res Transl Med

July 2023

Service d'Oncologie médicale, APHP-SU, IUC, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.

Cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) is a common, multifactor event known to complicate the course of cancer and jeopardize a patient's prognosis. The current guidelines regarding the prevention of CAT are sometimes considered insufficiently precise about specific situations, or are poorly applied. The expected benefits of thromboprophylaxis are balanced by the risk of major bleeding induced by anticoagulation, which implies a need to accurately identify ambulatory patients at high risk of thrombosis or hemorrhage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cancer patients are at higher risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several risk assessment models (RAM), including the Khorana and COMPASS-CAT, were developed to help predict the occurrence of VTE in cancer patients on active anti-cancer therapy. We aim to study the prevalence and predictors of VTE among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compare both RAMs in predicting VTE in patients with NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!