AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Most research in comparative cognition focuses on measuring if animals manage certain tasks; fewer studies explore how animals might solve them. We investigated bumblebees' scanning strategies in a numerosity task, distinguishing patterns with two items from four and one from three, and subsequently transferring numerical information to novel numbers, shapes, and colors. Video analyses of flight paths indicate that bees do not determine the number of items by using a rapid assessment of number (as mammals do in "subitizing"); instead, they rely on sequential enumeration even when items are presented simultaneously and in small quantities. This process, equivalent to the motor tagging ("pointing") found for large number tasks in some primates, results in longer scanning times for patterns containing larger numbers of items. Bees used a highly accurate working memory, remembering which items have already been scanned, resulting in fewer than 1% of re-inspections of items before making a decision. Our results indicate that the small brain of bees, with less parallel processing capacity than mammals, might constrain them to use sequential pattern evaluation even for low quantities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7750931PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

items
7
bumblebees sequential
4
sequential scanning
4
scanning countable
4
countable items
4
items visual
4
visual patterns
4
patterns solve
4
solve numerosity
4
numerosity tasks
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!