A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Development of Feasible Methods to Image the Eyelid Margin Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy. | LitMetric

Development of Feasible Methods to Image the Eyelid Margin Using In Vivo Confocal Microscopy.

Cornea

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.

Published: October 2020

Purpose: To develop a feasible method to image eyelid margin structures using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) for use in clinical research. Second, to assess the association between IVCM and meibography images.

Methods: IVCM was performed on the central upper eyelid margin of 13 healthy participants (31 ± 5 years). Overall morphology montages (1600 × 1600 μm) were created of 3 participants. Single frames (400 × 400 μm) of 10 participants were imaged to determine the feasibility of measuring eyelid features. Meibography was performed with EASYTEARview+ in the same 10 participants. ImageJ software was used to quantify image structures.

Results: In the montages, structures of rete ridges, meibomian gland openings, and the lid wiper region were observed. The maximum possible montage size, using multiple single frames, was approximately 5200 × 1500 × 150 μm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. The mean number, density, area, perimeter, and shortest and longest diameters of rete ridges of the 9 nonoverlapped frames were 12 ± 2/frame, 73 ± 5/mm, 2504 ± 403 μm, 250 ± 33 μm, 40 ± 6 μm, and 84 ± 13 μm, respectively. Sampling analysis determined at least 5 nonoverlapped frames were necessary to accurately represent the parameters of the ridges. The mean areas of 3 meibomian openings were 785 ± 784 μm, 1036 ± 963 μm, 950 ± 1071 μm, 848 ± 954 μm, 737 ± 831 μm, 735 ± 743 μm, and from 30 μm to 130 μm at 20-μm depth intervals, respectively. No significant association between IVCM and meibography parameters (P = 0.53) was found.

Conclusions: Imaging rete ridges with IVCM should include at least 5 nonoverlapping single frames in the upper eyelid margin. At least 3 openings imaged between 30 and 130 μm at 20-μm depth intervals are recommended to determine the opening area.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002347DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

eyelid margin
16
μm
16
single frames
12
rete ridges
12
μm μm
12
image eyelid
8
vivo confocal
8
confocal microscopy
8
association ivcm
8
ivcm meibography
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!