A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of Electronic Alternatives to Tobacco Cigarettes on Indoor Air Particular Matter Levels. | LitMetric

An aerosol study was carried out in a test room measuring particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10, 4, 2.5 and 1 µm (PM, PM, PM, PM) before and during the use of electronic alternatives to tobacco cigarettes (EATC) IQOS, GLO, JUUL, with different kinds of sticks/pods, as well as during the smoking of a conventional tobacco cigarette. The aerosol was mainly in the PM size range (>95%). All studied EATCs caused lower indoor PM concentrations than conventional tobacco cigarettes. Nevertheless, they determined a worsening of indoor-PM concentration that ranged from very mild for JUUL-depending on the pod used-to considerably severe for IQOS and GLO. Median values ranged from 11.00 (Iqos3 and Juul2) to 337.5 µg m (Iqos4). The high variability of particle loadings was attributed both to the type of stick/pod used and to the different way of smoking of volunteers who smoked/vaped during the experiments. Moreover, during vaping IQOS and GLO indoor PM concentrations reach levels by far higher than outdoor concentrations that range from 14 to 21 µg m, especially during the exhalation of the smoke. From these results emerge an urgent need of a legislative regulation limiting the use of such devices in public places.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7254302PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082947DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tobacco cigarettes
12
iqos glo
12
electronic alternatives
8
alternatives tobacco
8
conventional tobacco
8
indoor concentrations
8
impact electronic
4
tobacco
4
cigarettes indoor
4
indoor air
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!