Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182288 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0113-2020 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
SARS-COV-2 and Ocular Surface: From Physiology to Pathology, a Route to Understand Transmission and Disease.
Front Physiol
February 2021
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Coronaviruses gained public attention during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in East Asia in 2003 and spread of Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012. Direct human-to-human contact and droplet are the main methods of transmission. Viral stability in aerosols on different surfaces supports evidence on indirect viral acquisition from fomites through the mucous membranes of the mouth, nose, and eyes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCounterargument to the editor's letter about the article "Evaluation of functional disability after Chikungunya infection".
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop
September 2020
Universidade CEUMA, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão de Programas e Serviços de Saúde, São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Open research practices: unintended consequences and suggestions for averting them. (Commentary on the Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative).
R Soc Open Sci
April 2016
Department of Experimental Psychology , University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD , UK.
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative (PROI) is a move to enlist reviewers in the promotion of data-sharing. In this commentary, I discuss objections that can be raised, first to the specific proposals in the PROI, and second to data-sharing in general. I argue that although many objections have strong counter-arguments, others merit more serious consideration.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlternative treatments in reproductive medicine. The vexing problem of 'seemingly impeccable trials...'.
Hum Reprod
September 2002
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, C9-P, P.O.Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
The problem of 'seemingly impeccable trials' that produce unbelievable results is approached from basic notions of the philosophy of science: facts and theory are interdependent, and 'crucial experiments' do not exist. This does not lead to an 'anything goes' attitude, but obliges us to consider arguments and counter-arguments in the spirit of the 'crossword' analogy by Susan Haack. The role of editors and readers might be different: while editors might be under some obligation to publish 'seemingly impeccable trials', readers are not obliged to accept the findings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!