Binary vs. continuous conceptualizations of consciousness may have an unstated influence on experimental designs in unconscious perception research. The binary approach aims to compare a conscious condition (e.g., supraliminal, no or weak stimulus masking) to an unconscious condition (e.g., subliminal, heavy stimulus masking). In contrast, continuous designs tend to vary stimulus energy along a near-threshold continuum to determine changes in perception as a function of stimulus energy (or duration). The present study compared two experimental designs, binary vs. continuous, for the influence of target-masked prime stimuli on a Stroop task. The display parameters were inspired by emotional Stroop studies reporting unconscious perception. Neither experiment produced strong evidence of unconscious perception, but the experiment with a continuous design was more informative. We thus recommend sampling a range of near-threshold display parameters to yield straight-forward, unambiguous interpretations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2020.102933 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!