Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. We discuss our investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG). The TFWG identified 12 actors (eg, vendors, clinicians, and policy makers) within a CDS ecosystem who each may play a meaningful role in prioritizing, authoring, implementing, or evaluating CDS and developed 33 recommendations distributed across nine "trust attributes." The trust attributes and recommendations represent a range of considerations such as the "Competency" of knowledge artifact engineers and the "Organizational Capacity" of institutions that develop and implement CDS. The TFWG findings highlight an initial effort to make trust explicit and embedded within CDS knowledge artifacts and repositories and thus more broadly accepted and used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7156865PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10208DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knowledge artifacts
12
clinical decision
8
decision support
8
cds
8
patient-centered cds
8
cds learning
8
artifacts repositories
8
trust
6
knowledge
5
building maintaining
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!