The Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale (CPPS) is an instrument designed to measure therapist interventions in a psychotherapy session. The scale includes 20 items divided into two subscales: the PI (psychodynamic-interpersonal) scale, which describes psychodynamic-interpersonal techniques; and the CB (cognitive-behavioural) scale, which includes cognitive-behavioural interventions. The aim of the study was to examine the psychometric properties of the CPPS, comparing the PI and CB subscales with the psychodynamic, cognitive and STTP prototypes, as described by the Psychotherapy Process Q-set(PQS). The sample comprised 94 sessions (N = 94) of psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioural orientation. Two groups of independent raters with excellent interrater reliability (ICC = .78) evaluated the sessions. The results suggest that the CPPS is a valid and reliable instrument that provides a clinically sensitive and psychometrically robust evaluation of a therapist's techniques. The clinical and research implications of the results are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2462 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Sound-symbol learning and the relationship to spelling in first-grade children.
J Exp Child Psychol
January 2025
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 München, Germany.
Early spelling depends on the ability to understand the alphabetic principle and to translate speech sounds into visual symbols (letters). Thus, the ability to associate sound-symbol pairs might be an important predictor of spelling development. Here, we examined the relation between sound-symbol learning (SSL) and early spelling skills.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHow we see the world: Inflexible interpretation updating as a predictor and moderator of PTSD symptoms in high-risk occupations.
Psychol Trauma
January 2025
Department of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Saarland University.
Objective: The way we interpret information shapes our perception of reality. Predictive processing frameworks propose that the ability to update interpretations based on disconfirming information is key to recovery from potentially traumatic events (PTEs). However, direct evidence for this assumption is scarce and comes from studies using paradigms with low ecological validity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn search of lost time: Discrete- versus continuous-time models of working alliance and symptom severity.
J Consult Clin Psychol
January 2025
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabruck University.
Objective: The therapeutic alliance is one of the most stable predictors of symptom burden over the course of therapy. So far, this effect has only been examined on the basis of sessions. Continuous-time models (CTM) allow this relationship to be modeled as a continuous process in which the actual time interval between measurements is considered.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFeels good, and less bad: Problematic use of the Internet is associated with heightened experiences of both gratification and compensation.
J Behav Addict
January 2025
1General Psychology: Cognition, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
Background: During the development of addictive behaviors, theoretical models assume a shift from experience of gratification being a driver in early stages to experience of compensation which dominates at later stages of addiction development. Initial studies show a trend in this direction; however, this shift has not yet been investigated in clinical samples. We assume experienced gratification to be highest in individuals with risky use (indicating the beginning of the addiction process), and compensation to be highest in individuals with pathological use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomarkers.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Background: Differences in task-fMRI activation have recently been found to be related to neuropathological hallmarks of AD. However, the evolution of fMRI-based activation throughout AD disease progression and its relationship with other biomarkers remains elusive. Applying a disease progression model (DPM) to a multicentric cohort with up to four annual task-fMRI visits, we hope to provide a deeper insight into these relationships.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!