AI Article Synopsis

  • Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a noninvasive technique that uses blood pressure cuff cycles to protect the heart from damage during heart attacks.
  • A study compared the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for STEMI patients receiving RIC before PCI versus those receiving standard care.
  • The results showed no significant reduction in MACE at 90 days with RIC, but patients with severe conditions like cardiogenic shock showed a decrease in adverse events when RIC was used, indicating the need for further research on RIC's long-term benefits.

Article Abstract

Background: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a noninvasive therapeutic strategy that uses brief cycles of blood pressure cuff inflation and deflation to protect the myocardium against ischemia-reperfusion injury. We sought to compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for patients who received RIC before PCI for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) compared with standard care.

Methods: We conducted a pre- and postimplementation study. In the preimplementation phase, STEMI patients were taken directly to the PCI lab. After implementation, STEMI patients received 4 cycles of RIC by paramedics or emergency department staff before PCI. The primary outcome was MACE at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included MACE at 30, 60, and 180 days. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores estimated causal effects independent from baseline covariables.

Results: A total of 1667 (866 preimplementation, 801 postimplementation) patients were included. In the preimplementation phase, 13.4% had MACE at 90 days compared with 11.8% in the postimplementation phase (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.62-1.21). There were no significant differences in MACE at 30, 60, and 180 days. Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest before PCI were less likely to have MACE at 90 days (42.7% pre vs 27.8% post) if they received RIC before PCI (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.98).

Conclusions: A strategy of RIC before PCI for STEMI did not reduce 90-day MACE. Future research should explore the impact of RIC before PCI for longer-term clinical outcomes and for patients presenting with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2019.11.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ric pci
16
mace days
12
remote ischemic
8
ischemic conditioning
8
st-segment-elevation myocardial
8
myocardial infarction
8
patients received
8
received ric
8
preimplementation phase
8
stemi patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!