Scale for the Evaluation of Risk of Aggressiveness in Psychiatric Intensive Care Units.

Actas Esp Psiquiatr

Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IdIBGI), Girona, Catalunya Unitat de Valoració de la Memòria i les Demències. Hospital Santa Caterina, Institut d'Assistència Sanitària, Salt, Catalunya Departament de Ciències Mèdiques, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Catalunya.

Published: January 2020

Introduction: The multifactorial origin of violent behaviors generates the need to use prediction tools adapted to different contexts, patient profiles and types of aggression. The main objective of this work was to design an instrument to detect the risk of violence and aggression quickly and effectively in patients with mental disorder in psychiatric intensive care units.

Material And Methods: The sample consisted of 722 admissions of 629 patients from the psychiatric intensive care units. Violent incidents were recorded using the Overt Aggression Scale (OAS). A new scale has been designed and its psychometric properties have been evaluated.

Results: The Scale for the Evaluation of Risk of Aggressiveness (ERA) includes static and dynamic risk factors, has an AUC=0.854, a sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 73%, a positive predictive value of 62% and a negative predictive value of 88% when the cut-off point of ¾ is used to determine the risk of violent or aggressive behavior.

Conclusions: The ERA has proven to be a valid and reliable instrument to forecast the risk of aggressiveness in patients admitted to an acute care unit of psychiatry. It also allows monitoring and updating this risk during the patient's stay in the psychiatric intensive care unit.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychiatric intensive
16
intensive care
16
risk aggressiveness
12
scale evaluation
8
evaluation risk
8
care units
8
care unit
8
risk
7
care
5
scale
4

Similar Publications

Impact of Omega-3 Enriched Lipid Emulsions on Retinopathy of Prematurity in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Indian J Pediatr

January 2025

Department of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.

Objectives: To assess the effects of ω-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LCPUFA)-enriched lipid emulsions (SMOFlipid) vs. traditional soybean oil-based lipid emulsions (Intralipid) on the occurrence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 301 VLBW infants who received either SMOFlipid or Intralipid for a minimum of 14 d were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly challenged the global healthcare system, especially frontline healthcare professionals, such as those working in intensive care units (ICUs). In late 2022, a sudden increase in COVID-19 cases in China led to a large number of ICU admissions, requiring new ICU staff (non-ICU professionals to work in ICUs), exacerbating their stress. This study aimed to develop an effective stress management strategy for new ICU professionals, focusing on reducing the detrimental effects of stress on their psychological state.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a psychiatric-neurologic emergency that may require intensive care management. There is a paucity of information about NMS as a critical illness. We reviewed the Mayo Clinic experience.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Benzodiazepines and z-drugs are often prescribed to critical care survivors due to high prevalence of mental health problems and insomnia. However, their safety has not been studied in this population.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 28,678 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018: 4844 prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs, matched to 23,834 unexposed survivors using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked datasets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To summarize the delirium treatment trial literature, identify the unique challenges in delirium treatment trials, and formulate recommendations to address each in older adults.

Design: A 39-member interprofessional and international expert working group of clinicians (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) and nonclinicians (biostatisticians, epidemiologists, and trial methodologists) was convened. Four expert panels were assembled to explore key subtopics (pharmacological/nonpharmacologic treatment, methodological challenges, and novel research designs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!