A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prognostic value of pretreatment tumor-to-blood standardized uptake ratio (SUR) in rectal cancer. | LitMetric

Objectives: The prognostic value of SUV on pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with rectal cancer is a matter of debate. SUR is of prognostic value for survival in different cancers. In this study, we aimed to examine the potential prognostic value of SUR and other parameters in pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT for non-metastatic rectal cancer.

Methods: One hundred four non-metastatic rectal cancer patients who underwent pretreatment PET/CT between March 2012 and January 2018 were included in the study. Firstly, SUV, SUV, MTV, and TLG were calculated semi-automatically at the workstation. SUR was calculated as the ratio of tumor SUV to thoracic aorta blood SUV. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local recurrence (LR). Then, multivariate Cox regression analysis, which included the parameters that were significant in the univariate analysis, was performed.

Results: Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that SUR was a prognostic factor for PFS. Age and T stage were prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. MTV was found to be independent risk factors for OS.

Conclusions: In our study, SUR was the only F-18 FDG PET/CT parameter found to be significant for PFS. The development of new parameters can increase the prognostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01465-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

f-18 fdg
16
fdg pet/ct
16
rectal cancer
12
cox regression
12
pretreatment f-18
8
sur prognostic
8
non-metastatic rectal
8
multivariate cox
8
regression analysis
8
prognostic
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!