Breastfeeding: A standard or an intervention? Review of systematic reviews.

Med Hypotheses

Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Croatian Institute of Public Health, Rockefeller's Street 7, Zagreb, Croatia.

Published: August 2020

Clinical trials designed to answer treatment-related questions typically compare an intervention group that receives a drug or other intervention to a control group that serves as a standard against which results of the intervention are evaluated. An observed divergence from this trend in research papers on breastfeeding led us to hypothesize that the majority of breastfeeding research designs assign breastfed children to an intervention group rather than the control group, although breastfeeding is a physiological way of feeding infants that may be considered as a general standard. Headlines and abstracts of 760 publications identified in 2 databases were checked, and a total of 68 systematic reviews were included in our review with the goal to see if breastfed children were mostly considered as the intervention or control group. Our review showed that in 79,41% of papers breastfed children were regarded as the intervention group. The results of these papers were usually presented in a manner to show breastfeeding was beneficial in comparison to formula-feeding - as if breastfeeding was a health intervention. This way of data presentation probably helps to form attitude that formula-feeding is the norm and breastfeeding an optional choice, a "superstandard" with certain health benefits. Therefore, all available studies that regard breastfeeding should be interpreted with caution. We suggest that authors, while conducting and reporting clinical trials, regard breastfed children as the control group, and non-breastfed children as the intervention group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109737DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intervention group
16
control group
16
breastfed children
16
breastfeeding
8
systematic reviews
8
clinical trials
8
intervention
8
group
8
intervention control
8
children intervention
8

Similar Publications

Background: This study tested the hypothesis that extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ECSWT) effectively rescues critical limb ischemia (CLI) in mice through the upregulation of GPR120, which protects against inflammation and angiogenesis to restore blood flow in the ischemic area.

Methods And Results: Compared with the control, ECSWT-induced GPR120-mediated anti-inflammatory effects significantly suppressed the expression of inflammatory signaling biomarkers (TAK1/MAPK family/NF-κB/IL-1β/IL-6/TNF-α/MCP-1) in HUVECs, and these effects were abolished by silencing GPR120 or by the GPR120 antagonist AH7614 (all P < 0.001).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pancreatic surgery is considered one of the most challenging interventions by many surgeons, mainly due to retroperitoneal location and proximity to key and delicate vascular structures. These factors make pancreatic resection a demanding procedure, with successful rates far from optimal and frequent postoperative complications. Surgical planning is essential to improve patient outcomes, and in this regard, many technological advances made in the last few years have proven to be extremely useful in medical fields.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Microsurgery demands an intensive period of skill acquisition due to its inherent complexity. The development and implementation of innovative training methods are essential for enhancing microsurgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a simulation training program on the clinical results of fingertip replantation surgeries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes between endovascular and open repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Surg

January 2025

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong Hospital of Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University, Nanchong, China.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of endovascular versus open repair for the treatment of patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA).

Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies was performed. Outcome data, including postoperative mortality and morbidity, operative details, all-cause survival, freedom from aortic-related survival and freedom from aortic-related re-intervention, were independently extracted by two authors in a standardized way.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Pediatric peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion can be difficult and time-consuming, frequently requiring multiple insertion attempts and often resulting in increased anxiety, distress, and treatment avoidance among children and their families. Ultrasound-guided PIVC insertion is a superior alternative to standard technique (palpation and visualization) in high-risk patients.

Objective: To compare first-time insertion success of PIVCs inserted with ultrasound guidance compared with standard technique (palpation and visualization) across all risk categories in the general pediatric hospital population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!