The treatment of patients with mixed dentition, with inferior moderate dental crowding (the so-called borderline cases, between extraction and expansion) is not yet clear. Two examples of widely used appliances for increasing lower dental arch dimensions are the Schwarz's appliance and lip bumper. The aim of this prospective study was to compare dental crowding and arch dimensions from pre- to post-treatment with lip bumper versus Schwarz's appliance. Pre- and post-treatment orthodontic records of twenty subjects (10 males and 10 females) were analyzed in the present study. Inclusion criteria were: first/second molar class malocclusion; crowding of the mandibular arch, from mild to moderate (4-6 mm); mixed dentition; age ≤ 9 years at the beginning of the treatment; stage CS1 or CS2 of maturation of the cervical vertebrae analysis (CVM) at the beginning of the treatment. Ten subjects were treated with a lip bumper, and ten with the removable Schwarz appliance. The primary outcomes were the variations in dental crowding and arch dimensions from pre- to post-treatment. Both the two appliances caused a statistically significant mean improvement/reduction in crowding, of 3.5 mm and 2.9 mm, for the Schwarz appliance and lip bumper, respectively. The Schwarz appliance resulted more effective in increasing arch dimension at the intercanine level, and arch perimeter, while the lip bumper achieves a higher increase in arch length. A lip bumper and Schwarz appliance are both useful in reducing crowding in mixed dentition. This improvement is due to the increase in dental arch dimensions, although the distribution of space resulted slightly differently between the two appliances.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344829PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8020034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lip bumper
28
schwarz appliance
20
arch dimensions
16
dental arch
12
mixed dentition
12
dental crowding
12
pre- post-treatment
12
arch
9
lower dental
8
bumper versus
8

Similar Publications

Oral mucoceles are common lesions resulting from alterations in minor salivary glands due to mucus accumulation. Deleterious habits such as lip biting, sucking, or trauma from oral appliances can result in the occurrence of mucoceles. Although conventional surgical removal has been the preferred treatment option, it is associated with drawbacks, including the risk of damaging nearby ducts and the formation of satellite lesions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oral habits in children are of prime concern to a pediatric dentist as the child is in an active growth phase, and it may alter the development of the orofacial area. One of the major etiological factors in the development of malocclusion and other adverse effects on orofacial structures is oral habits during and after preschool age. The habit of sucking one's lower lip is rarely examined; it appears that practitioners tend to associate it with less adverse clinical consequences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To investigate the short-term dentoalveolar effects on the mandibular arch of a modified, aesthetic lip bumper (ALBAa). The study sample comprised 23 patients (13 boys and 10 girls, with a mean age of 9.5 ± 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oral habits are an acquired mode of behavior that has become nearly or completely involuntary. Oral habits such as thumb sucking, lip sucking, tongue thrusting, lip biting, nail biting, object biting, and bruxism have serious health consequences. Several etiological factors have been linked to the development of oral habits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Currently, there is little consensus regarding the spontaneous uprighting of the mandibular dentoalveolar complex in response to maxillary expansion, which poses the question about the necessity of combining mandibular treatment with rapid maxillary expansion to coordinate the maxilla and mandible transversely. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the bonded rapid maxillary expander (RME) alone compared with RME with lip bumper (LB) treatment on the mandibular transverse changes.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 3 groups: the control group with no orthodontic or orthopedic treatment (23 patients [14 females, 9 males]; mean age 9.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!