Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Phase coherence is an important measure in nonlinear science. Whereas there is no generally accepted definition for phase and therefore for phase coherence, many works associate this feature with topological aspects of the systems, such as having a well-defined rotating center. Given the relevance of this concept for synchronization problems, one aim of this paper is to argue by means of a couple of counterexamples that phase coherence is not related to the topology of the attractor. A second aim is to introduce a phase-coherence measure based on recurrence plots, for which probabilities of recurrences for two different trajectories are similar for a phase-coherent system and dissimilar for non-phase-coherent systems. The measure does not require a phase variable defined a priori.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.032207 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!