AI Article Synopsis
- Patients are increasingly accessing radiology results online, and a study aimed to compare satisfaction and understanding of these results between electronic portal notifications and direct provider communication.
- The study surveyed 1,005 patients within a week of their radiology exam, finding no significant difference in satisfaction with notification timing (around 89% satisfaction for both methods), but those receiving results via the portal felt less informed (26.7% vs. 47.8% understood their results).
- The conclusion suggests that while online result notification is convenient, improvements in how results are communicated through portals could enhance patient understanding and overall experience.
Article Abstract
Objective: Patients increasingly access radiology results through digital portals. We compared patient satisfaction and understanding of radiology results when received through an electronic patient portal versus direct communication from providers.
Methods: Patients were invited to participate in an online survey within 7 days of undergoing a radiology examination. Participants received one of two survey versions, based on whether or not they viewed results in the patient portal. The associations between method of result notification and satisfaction with notification timing and self-reported understanding of results were evaluated using χ tests and logistic regression.
Results: Of 1,005 survey respondents, 87.8% (882 of 1,005) reported having received their imaging test results, with 486 (48.4%) first being notified through the patient portal and 396 (39.4%) via direct provider communication. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with timing regardless of whether they first received the results through the patient portal or through direct provider communication (88.8%-89.9%). Patients who first received their results through the patient portal reported a lesser degree of perceived understanding than those who first received their results through direct provider communication (26.7% versus 47.8%; P < .001). Patients were less likely to report clear understanding for advanced imaging (CT or MRI) than ultrasound or x-rays (29.3% versus 40.3% versus 38.2%, respectively; P = .02). Patient characteristics showed no association with understanding in multivariable analysis.
Conclusion: As online portal release of radiology results to patients becomes commonplace, efforts may be warranted to improve patient experience when first receiving their radiology results online.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.046 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Are we systematically overdosing women? Revisiting standardized contrast protocols for thoracoabdominal CT scans.
Eur Radiol
January 2025
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the iodine contrast in blood and solid organs differs between men and women and to evaluate the effect of BMI, height, weight, and blood volume (BV) on sex-specific contrast in staging CT.
Materials And Methods: Patients receiving a venous-phase thoracoabdominal Photon-Counting Detector CT (PCD-CT) scan with 100- or 120-mL CM between 08/2021 and 01/2022 were retrospectively included in this single-center study. Image analysis was performed by measuring iodine contrast in the liver, portal vein, spleen, left atrium, left ventricle, pulmonary trunk, ascending and descending aorta on spectral PCD-CT datasets.
Ischemic cholangiopathy secondary to endoscopic treatment of bleeding duodenal ulcer.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig
January 2025
Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre.
Case report of a patient with a duodenal ulcer, initially treated with sclerosing agents, as is common practice for most bleeding ulcers. However, the evolution following this treatment is unusual. The patient developed secondary ischemic cholangitis, leading to extensive aerobilia and secondary portal pneumatosis, accompanied by inflammatory changes in the head of the pancreas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Although investment in biomedical and pharmaceutical research has increased significantly over the past two decades, there are no oral disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Method: We performed comprehensive human genetic and multi-omics data analyses to test likely causal relationship between EPHX2 (encoding soluble epoxide hydrolase [sEH]) and risk of AD. Next, we tested the effect of the oral administration of EC5026 (a first-in-class, picomolar sEH inhibitor) in a transgenic mouse model of AD-5xFAD and mechanistic pathways of EC5026 in patient induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSC) derived neurons.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Compliance and Early Outcomes for Elective Colorectal Procedures by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status.
Ann Surg
January 2025
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA.
Objective: To explore the association of socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity with perioperative metrics within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) framework to identify gaps for equity-informed improvements.
Summary Background Data: Although ERAS pathways improve perioperative outcomes through standardized care, disparities in protocol adherence and postoperative outcomes persist, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a single-institution database of elective colorectal surgeries (2018-2021).
Percutaneous Transhepatic Venous Embolization and Portal Vein Stenting for Ectopic Variceal Bleeding at Choledochojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy With Portal Vein Stenosis: A Case Report.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, JPN.
Ectopic varices can result from portal vein stenosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant portal vein resection reconstruction, and they can cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Although they can sometimes be fatal, various treatments have been reported. This report describes a case in which a percutaneous transhepatic approach was used to simultaneously perform variceal embolization and portal vein stenting in which a favorable outcome was achieved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!