Classic cases revisited: Of hurricanes, cyanide and moral courage.

J Intensive Care Soc

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.

Published: February 2020

All decisions made by doctors have a moral dimension. When a moral judgement demands a different course of action to one that represents the usual practice, many doctors do struggle. The inability to embrace such decisions can represent moral negligence, as often the consequence is greater suffering for the individual in question or loss of utility for the population. On the other hand, it takes courage to make such decisions as the society fails to accept them, even though decisions made are rational and morally valid. Clinical practice that does not conform to moral judgements can result in moral distress, burn out and job-leave. Reflective practice evaluating moral dimensions of clinical decision making is an important aspect of nurturing humanity, empathy and professionalism in the therapeutic endeavour.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137158PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1751143718787755DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

courage decisions
8
moral
7
classic cases
4
cases revisited
4
revisited hurricanes
4
hurricanes cyanide
4
cyanide moral
4
moral courage
4
decisions
4
decisions doctors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!