Background And Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) sometimes results in bloc resection with a positive or inconclusive horizontal margin (HM1 or HMX, respectively) on histological evaluation. The specific risk for such situations is unclear. We therefore investigated the outcome of ESD with HM1 or HMX.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study was performed at Osaka International Cancer Institute. A total of 886 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma lesions in 749 patients treated from April 2005 to June 2015 were evaluated according to the following inclusion criteria: bloc resection with no residual lesion, HM1 or HMX status, no prior treatment, and no additional treatment. We classified HM1 and HMX into type A, in which cancer was exposed on the HM, and type B, in which the HM status was unclear because of mechanical or thermal damage. We further classified type B according to the distance between the cancer and the edge of the specimen: type B1, <1 mm and type B2, ≥1 mm.
Results: The resection margin was judged as HM1 or HMX in 5.0% (39/767; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-6.6%) of the bloc resected specimens. Of 39 lesions, 30 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Local recurrence developed in 8 of 30 lesions (26.7%). The local recurrence rates for types A, B1, and B2 were 40% (6/15 lesions), 28.5% (2/7 lesions), and 0.0% (0/8 lesions), respectively.
Conclusions: Although a statistical analysis was not conducted because of the limited events, the pathological HM status may be a useful predictor of local recurrence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144764 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12233 | DOI Listing |
Scand J Gastroenterol
September 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal.
Background And Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) sometimes results in bloc resection with a positive or inconclusive horizontal margin (HM1 or HMX, respectively) on histological evaluation. The specific risk for such situations is unclear. We therefore investigated the outcome of ESD with HM1 or HMX.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
November 2015
aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada bDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute cCINTESIS/Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics dDepartment of Physiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Research & Development Unit, Porto Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal.
Objective: Endoscopic resection is a standard treatment for gastric superficial lesions. A positive or a nonevaluable margin is considered a noncurative criterion. We aimed to systematically review recurrence, residual disease, lymph node metastasis (LNM) and cancer-related death following Rx/R1 resection of gastric lesions in the absence of other noncurative criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnticancer Res
May 2015
Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Aim: The appropriate additional surgery after non-curative resection of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (ESD) for early gastric cancer is herein discussed.
Patients And Methods: Data on 54 patients after non-curative resection of ESD were evaluated. These patients were broadly classified according to the risk of lymph node metastasis with lesions into group A (without risk) (n=26) and group B (with risk) (n=28).
Gastrointest Endosc
February 2014
Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Background: Recent improvements in the survival of patients after esophagectomy have led to an increasing occurrence of gastric tube cancer (GTC). Removal of the reconstructed gastric tube, however, can lead to high morbidity and mortality.
Objective: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for GTC.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!