Background: A total hip reconstruction is related to the stress distribution throughout the prosthesis, cement, and femur. Researches on reducing the stress in all components to minimize the risk of failure are of great significance. The objective of our study was to determine the biomechanical variation in overall femoral stress and periprosthetic femoral stress distribution after implantation with the Ribbed anatomic prosthesis.
Methods: Three-dimensional finite element models of intact femur and Ribbed prosthesis were developed according to the morphology, while the hip joint loading and the strength of related muscles were applied in the models. The overall stress changes of the intact femur before and after the implantation were analyzed, and the periprosthetic stress distribution especially in the proximal region of the femur was quantified.
Results: As a result, the overall stress pattern of the femur did not change after the implantation compared with the intact femur. The region of peak stress value was located in the middle and lower segments of the full length femur, but the stress value level decreased. The final prosthesis resulted in a significant decrease in the equivalent stress level of the periprosthetic bone tissue, and the most severe area appeared at the endmost posterior quadrant. The stress shielding ratio of the Ribbed prosthesis was 71.6%. The stress value level gradually increased towards the distal part of the prosthesis and recovered to physiological level at the end of the prosthesis.
Conclusions: The Ribbed prosthesis can cause significant stress shielding effect in the proximal femur. These results may help optimize prosthetic design to reduce stress shielding effect and improve clinical outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125441 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6783936 | DOI Listing |
Clin Oral Investig
November 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos - 6627, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am
February 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, 653 8th Street West, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
The use of dental implants and prostheses in the oral rehabilitation process after maxillofacial ablation procedures is now regarded as standard practice. Numerous donor sites for free vascularized bone transfer in head and neck reconstruction have been well-documented in the literature including the ribs, ilium, fibula, scapula, and radius. Among these, the fibula is the most commonly used and studied for placing endosseous implants and for rehabilitation purposes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cardiothorac Surg
October 2024
Yanda Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China.
Resection of thoracic wall tumors results in significant defects in the chest wall, leading to various complications. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional (3D) printed titanium alloy prostheses in clinical practice has demonstrated enhanced outcomes in chest wall reconstruction surgery. A cohort of seven patients with sternal tumors was identified for this study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent Mater
November 2024
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Passo Fundo, Campus I - BR 285, Passo Fundo, RS 99052-900, Brazil. Electronic address:
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!