TVT-O vs TVT-S for female stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and tension-free vaginal tape secur (TVT-S) are common surgeries for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effects of TVT-O and TVT-S, yet the results remained inconsistent. Therefore, we attempted to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the role of TVT-O and TVT-S in patients with SUI.

Methods: We searched PubMed databases from inception date to Jan 15, 2020 for RCTs that compared TVT-O and TVT-S in SUI patients. Two authors independently screened and extracted data from the published articles. Summary odd ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for each outcome by fixed- or random-effects model.

Results: Seven RCTs with a total of 755 patients were identified, with 373 patients for TVT-O and 382 patients for TVT-S. TVT-O preceded TVT-S in the objective cure at 12 months (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45), subjective cure (OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.08-3.62); but TVT-S have more advantage in the incidence of postoperative thigh pain (OR = 18.94, 95% CI 7.01-51.15); no significant differences on the duration of operative procedure (OR = -1.09, 95% CI -2.37-0.18), urinary retention (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.36-1.62) and urinary infection (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 0.63-5.13) were found.

Conclusions: TVT-O should be preferred for patients with SUI even though with higher risks of postoperative thigh pain when compared with TVT-S, more related studies are needed to identify the role of TVT-O and TVT-S for the treatment of SUI.