Background: Use of standardized (or simulated) patients (SP) is considered an effective teaching method for improving clinical and communication skills. This study assesses the effect of a single-day simulated patients (SP)-based training course on medical students' communication and basic skills in clinical psychiatry during their psychiatry rotation in a university-affiliated tertiary medical center.

Methods: Forty-two third-year medical students participated. Communication and basic skills in clinical psychiatry were evaluated by a modified Four Habits Coding Scale (4HCS) and the psychiatric interview coding scale before and after SP training. An actual patient interview by the students 1 week after the training was evaluated by an attending psychiatrist blinded to the student's score during the SP-based training. Self-report questionnaires on satisfaction from the training and its impact on their self-confidence were administered at the end of training.

Findings: The mean pre-training 4HCS score of 33.9 increased to 52.3 post-training ( < 0.001). The mean psychiatric interview coding scale score increased from 4.33 to 5.36 ( = 0.002). The self-report questionnaire yielded a mean score of 4.21 on a 1-5 Likert scale, implying high levels of satisfaction and self-confidence.

Conclusions: A single SP-based training course of medical students sufficed to improve clinical and communication skills in psychiatric settings and enhance their subjective perception of those skills.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7099001PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medical students
8
simulated patients
8
sp-based training
8
communication basic
8
basic skills
8
skills clinical
8
clinical psychiatry
8
coding scale
8
training
6
single-day simulation-based
4

Similar Publications

Does empathy decline in the clinical phase of medical education? A study of students at Leicester medical school.

PEC Innov

December 2024

Stoneygate Centre for Empathic Healthcare, Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Rd, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK.

Objective: To examine whether medical student empathy changes throughout the five years of a UK medical school.

Methods: Students completed an online version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE-S) during the 2022-2023 academic year. Comparisons of empathy scores were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent -tests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remains alarming, especially among young people and college students, highlighting the vulnerability of this population. In the academic context, it is worth investigating whether medical students, despite their access to information, also engage in risky sexual behaviors.

Objective: The present study aims to describe the sexual behavior of Brazilian medical students, analyzing their level of knowledge about HIV/AIDS and other STIs, as well as examining potential correlations between this knowledge and risky behaviors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sociocultural aspects can impact sexual and reproductive health (SRH). Despite this, no study appraised the socio-cultural underpinnings impacting men's SRH in MENA (Middle East and North Africa). The current systematic review undertook this task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming the field of health science and medical education, but less is known about the students´ competencies related to knowledge, skills and attitudes towards the application of AI tools like ChatGPT. Therefore, a unicentric questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was applied to students in the medical field ( = 207). The data revealed that while most students were familiar with ChatGPT (66.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The authors aimed to determine if medical students' self-assessment of abilities and performance differed by gender during the psychiatry clerkship and if these differences were reflected objectively in test scores or clinical evaluations from educators.

Methods: Data from mid-clerkship self-assessments completed during the psychiatry core clerkship were reviewed from two classes of medical students. Students rated their performance on 14 items across five domains: knowledge/clinical reasoning, differential diagnosis, data presentation, studying skills, and teamwork as "below," "at," or "above expected level.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!