Background: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds membrane-bound and soluble IL-6 receptor-α to inhibit IL-6 signalling. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of sarilumab and adalimumab (a tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor) monotherapy on levels of circulating biomarkers associated with the acute-phase response, bone remodelling, atherothrombosis, anaemia of chronic disease and markers purported to reflect synovial lymphoid and myeloid cell infiltrates, as well as the potential of these biomarkers to differentially predict clinical and patient-reported outcomes with sarilumab vs. adalimumab.
Methods: In this post hoc analysis, serum samples were analysed at baseline and prespecified post-treatment timepoints up to week 24 in adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis intolerant of or inadequate responders to methotrexate from the MONARCH trial (NCT02332590).
Results: Greater reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP; - 94.0% vs. -24.0%), serum amyloid A (SAA; - 83.2% vs. -17.4%), total receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL; - 18.3% vs. 10.5%) and lipoprotein (a) (- 41.0% vs. -2.8%) were observed at week 24 with sarilumab vs. adalimumab, respectively (adjusted p < 0.0001). Greater increases in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were observed with sarilumab vs. adalimumab at week 24 (22.8% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.027). Patients with high baseline SAA, CRP and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) were more likely to achieve clinical efficacy, including American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria and Disease Activity Score (28 joints)-CRP < 3.2, and report improvements in patient-reported outcomes, including Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and pain visual analogue scale, with sarilumab than adalimumab.
Conclusion: Sarilumab was associated with greater positive effects on bone remodelling and decreases in biomarkers of the acute-phase response, synovial inflammation and cardiovascular risk vs. adalimumab. High baseline concentrations of SAA, CRP and MMP-3 are predictive of clinical and patient-reported outcome responses to sarilumab treatment and prospective validation is warranted to confirm these results.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02332590. Registered on 5 January 2015.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137491 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02163-6 | DOI Listing |
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in fatigue measured by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received sarilumab and to assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful change.
Methods: Data from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials of patients with RA who received sarilumab-MOBILITY, TARGET, and MONARCH-were evaluated. The 10 RA-relevant items from the 13-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue were scored in the PROMIS T score metric.
Med Clin North Am
September 2024
Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Street, Box 356428, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address:
RMD Open
December 2023
Centre for Rheumatology & Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK
Front Med (Lausanne)
November 2023
Hospital Pediatry, Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Adv Ther
October 2023
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!