Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Si:H and TiO multilayer dielectric gratings (MDGs) were studied comparatively to highlight the influence of refractive indices on fabrication tolerances, including tolerances for grating width errors and cross-sectional shape errors. The fabrication tolerance of Si:H MDGs is two to four times greater than that of TiO MDGs, because the higher refractive index of Si:H has a stronger ability to restrain electric fields. It was further revealed in these studies that a Si:H MDG with positive trapezoidal errors has minor influence on high diffraction efficiency bandwidth. Finally, a Si:H MDG was prepared without iterative corrections. Although large fabrication errors of grating width and cross-sectional shape existed, the MDG still had a 146 nm bandwidth with diffraction efficiency over 97%, which verifies the robustness of the proposed Si:H MDG.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab8768 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!