Objective: To compare two different methods of clinical outcomes documentation and investigate the potential impact of a quality assurance program.
Methods: Data on primary hip arthroplasties conducted between 2004 and 2014 were prospectively collected and analyzed.
Results: A total of 262/3395 patients suffered a postoperative complication. A reduction of complication rate was observed between 2010 and 2014. A significant difference between the two documentation methods was found in: "cardiovascular complications", "hematoma and postoperative hemorrhage" and "reintervention". Finally, the "normalized length of hospital stay" predicted the occurrence of complications.
Conclusion: Reduction of the incidence of complications through time may be attributed to accumulated surgical experience.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114597 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!