Quality assurance in primary total hip arthroplasty.

J Orthop

St. Josef Krankenhaus Essen-Werden, Propsteistraße 2, 45239, Essen, Germany.

Published: March 2020

Objective: To compare two different methods of clinical outcomes documentation and investigate the potential impact of a quality assurance program.

Methods: Data on primary hip arthroplasties conducted between 2004 and 2014 were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 262/3395 patients suffered a postoperative complication. A reduction of complication rate was observed between 2010 and 2014. A significant difference between the two documentation methods was found in: "cardiovascular complications", "hematoma and postoperative hemorrhage" and "reintervention". Finally, the "normalized length of hospital stay" predicted the occurrence of complications.

Conclusion: Reduction of the incidence of complications through time may be attributed to accumulated surgical experience.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7114597PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality assurance
8
assurance primary
4
primary total
4
total hip
4
hip arthroplasty
4
arthroplasty objective
4
objective compare
4
compare methods
4
methods clinical
4
clinical outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!