Evaluation of Rigidity of Surgical N95 Respirators Using a Manikin-System: A Pilot Study.

J Int Soc Respir Prot

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15236.

Published: January 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • Surgical N95 respirators are crucial for protecting healthcare workers from infectious aerosols and bodily fluids, but some models may collapse during heavy breathing, posing risks of contamination.
  • A study evaluated six surgical N95 designs under different humidity and temperature conditions to assess their rigidity and potential for facial contact with biological fluids.
  • Results indicated that cup-shaped models maintained their shape better than flat fold and trifold models, which showed significant changes in rigidity and potential contamination at higher flow rates and humidity.

Article Abstract

Background: Surgical N95 respirators are devices certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and also cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device. They are commonly used in healthcare settings to provide protection from infectious aerosols, as well as, bodily fluid sprays and splashes. It is hypothesized based on design, some models may change their shape significantly (i.e., collapse) during heavy breathing, which may allow the device to touch the wearer's face. Concerns have been raised that droplets of infectious biological fluids may reach the inner layer of surgical N95 respirators leading to the transfer of microorganisms to the oronasal facial region upon collapse. Unfortunately, little data currently exists on respirator rigidity testing or its relation to efficacy. The objective of this study was to develop and optimize a manikin-based test system to evaluate respirator rigidity.

Methods: Six surgical N95 models of three different designs (cup-shaped, flat fold and trifold) were tested at two different environmental conditions on the NIOSH medium headform. Rigidity evaluation was performed at 50% relative humidity (RH) and 22°C, and at ~100% RH and 33°C at 40, 50, and 60 L/min breathing flow rates. Facial contact secondary to shape change was assessed by coating the inner layer of the surgical N95 respirators with a fluorescent tracer and its transfer to the manikin face.

Results: The results showed that the cup-shaped models were rigid and resistant to shape change at both environmental conditions and all flow rates. In contrast, the flat fold models and trifold models showed significant changes with rigidity, at higher breathing flow rates and higher RH and temperature conditions. The flat fold models showed transfer of the fluorescent tracer to the manikin face at higher RH and breathing rates, confirming a change in rigidity.

Conclusions: The results from the study suggest that the manikin-based test system designed for the purposes of this study can be used to evaluate respirator rigidity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111508PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical n95
20
n95 respirators
16
flat fold
12
flow rates
12
inner layer
8
layer surgical
8
respirator rigidity
8
manikin-based test
8
test system
8
evaluate respirator
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!