AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of fixing both forearm bones versus just the radius in treating distal forearm fractures in children.
  • A total of 34 children were divided into two groups: one receiving both-bone fixation and the other receiving only radius fixation, with outcomes measured over an average follow-up period of 65.6 months for the first group and 38.9 months for the second.
  • Results showed no major functional or radiological differences between groups, with both techniques yielding similar outcomes in terms of healing time, complications, and functional scores.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the functional results of internal fixation of both forearm bones versus fixation of the radius alone in the treatment of distal both-bone forearm fractures in children.

Methods: This study included a total of 34 children who were treated for distal forearm both-bone fracture. Patients were divided into two groups according to the technique used, which depended on the date of their surgery. Group 1 consisted of 18 children (14 males and four females; mean age: 10.3 years; age range: 7-16 years) who underwent both-bone fracture fixation using closed reduction and percutaneous pinning; Group 2 consisted of 16 children (12 males and four females; mean age: 10.1 years; age range: 6-15 years) who underwent only radius fracture fixation. The average follow-up was 65.6 months in Group 1 and 38.9 months in Group 2. Operating time, fluoroscopy exposure time, functional results (Mayo Wrist Score, visual analogue scale score, and range of motion), radiological results (time to union and malunion), and complications were recorded as outcome parameters.

Results: The mean operating time was 35 min (range: 30-45 min) in Group 1 and 19 min (range: 10-25 min) in Group 2 (p<0.001). The mean fluoroscopy exposure time was 54 sec (range: 40-70 sec) in Group 1 and 18 sec (range: 10-26 sec) in Group 2 (p<0.001). Only three patients in Group 1 and four patients in Group 2 exhibited <10° of limitation in pronation and supination. No significant differences were determined between the groups with respect to functional scores (p=1.000). Final follow-up radiographs showed no malalignment in either group. In terms of time to union, there was no significant difference between groups (p=1.000). Additionally, only three minor complications associated with the pin track (two patients in Group 1 and one patient in Group 2) were noted.

Conclusion: In children with distal both-bone fractures, fixation of the radius fracture alone may be considered as an alternative method of treatment to fixation of both forearm bones as it results in satisfactory functional and radiographic outcomes.

Level Of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7286168PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.10DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

operating time
12
time fluoroscopy
8
fluoroscopy exposure
8
exposure time
8
time functional
8
distal forearm
8
forearm fractures
8
both-bone fracture
8
group consisted
8
consisted children
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!