Purpose: This study describes dispensing of potentially teratogenic prescription medicines before and during pregnancy in New Zealand over the period 2005-2015.
Methods: Records in a national dispensing database were linked with the members of the New Zealand Pregnancy Cohort to determine the proportion of pregnancies with at least one dispensing of a Category D or X medicine, using the Australian pregnancy risk categorisation system. Exposure was examined from 270 days prior to conception through to the end of pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes of D/X-exposed pregnancies were reviewed.
Results: In the study, 874,884 pregnancies were included. Overall, Category D and X medicines were dispensed during 4.3% and 0.058% of pregnancies, respectively. After excluding misoprostol, X exposure decreased to 0.035%. Generally, dispensing declined through the 270-day pre-pregnancy period and continued to decline throughout pregnancy. Dispensing of X medicines increased over the study timeframe, whereas dispensing of D medicines increased from 2005 to 2011 then declined slightly. Smokers were more likely than non-smokers to have been dispensed a D/X medicine, and compared with European women, Māori and Pacific women were less likely to have been dispensed a D/X medicine. Excluding misoprostol, pregnancies exposed to an X medicine were more likely than D/X-unexposed pregnancies to have ended in termination.
Conclusion: Dispensing of potentially harmful medicines in pregnancy in New Zealand was low, particularly for Category X medicines. However, exposure did increase over the study timeframe. The inclusion of pregnancies that did not progress past early pregnancy better reflects population-level pregnancy exposure to potentially teratogenic medicines.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-020-02868-2 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open
January 2025
General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Objectives: To explore the perspectives of Māori and Pacific women who participated in the Fish Oil study to ascertain what barriers and facilitators may exist for successfully recruiting Māori and Pacific women into clinical trials.
Design: A Kaupapa Māori qualitative study.
Setting: Auckland, New Zealand.
Surgery
January 2025
Department of Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address:
Background: With more women entering surgical training, barriers concerning pregnancy and breastfeeding are pertinent issues that have not been addressed adequately in a specialty with more men. An increasing body of evidence for the consequences of these challenges is emerging but has not been reviewed thoroughly. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the physical, emotional, and practical challenges of pregnancy and breastfeeding during surgical training and career and to elucidate the main difficulties and barriers female surgeons experience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObstet Gynecol Surv
December 2024
Associate Professor.
Importance: Rhesus alloimmunization refers to the sensitization of an Rh D-negative mother after exposure to D-positive fetal red blood cells, which can lead to significant fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published international guidelines on the prevention of maternal alloimmunization.
Evidence Acquisition: A comparative review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the British Committee for Standards in Hematology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada regarding the prevention of maternal Rh D alloimmunization was conducted.
J Law Med
November 2024
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University.
This article examines whether the current termination laws of Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand align with the midwifery scope of practice. It begins with an introduction to termination of pregnancy from a health care perspective. An overview of previous and current legal frameworks in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand that impact upon the provision of termination of pregnancy health services is provided.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Law Med
November 2024
Barrister, Castan Chambers, Melbourne, Australia; Professor of Law and Professorial Fellow in Psychiatry, University of Melbourne; Honorary Professor of Forensic Medicine, Monash; Adjunct Professor, Southern Cross University.
This editorial reviews the changes over two decades in the United States and Australia in relation to the law governing access to drugs enabling medical termination of pregnancy. It also scrutinises three contentious decisions by the United States Supreme Court between 2022 and 2024 in relation to abortion. It argues that the receptive environment in the United States Supreme Court, as it is currently constituted, to challenges to the lawfulness of terminations of pregnancy and abortion medications is likely to inspire comparable challenges as part of the "Abortion Wars" in other countries, including Australia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!