A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Imaging Features Differentiating Vestibular Ganglion from Intracanalicular Schwannoma on Single-Sequence Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. | LitMetric

Introduction: This study aimed to identify imaging features on single-sequence noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that differentiate the vestibular ganglion from small intracanalicular schwannomas.

Materials And Methods: Ninety patients (42 men and 48 women; age: 24‒87 years old) with 102 internal auditory canal (IAC) nodules (59 vestibular ganglia and 43 intracanalicular schwannoma) who underwent both single-sequence T2-weighted (T2W) non-contrast enhanced MRI studies and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1W) MRI studies between May 2012 and April 2017 were evaluated. The length, width, distance to the IAC fundus and length/width ratios for all lesions were obtained and compared among groups. Diagnostic performance and cutoff values of the parameters were evaluated with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Area under the curve (AUC) value was calculated.

Results: Vestibular ganglia have significantly smaller lengths and widths compared to intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (1.7 ± 0.4 mm and 1.0 ± 0.2 mm versus 5.6 ± 3.0 mm and 3.7 ± 1.5 mm). They are more fusiform in shape compared to vestibular schwannomas (length/width ratio: 1.8 ± 0.4 versus 1.5 ± 0.4). The lesion width demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.998). Using a cutoff width of <1.3 mm, the sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy for diagnosing vestibular ganglia were 97% (57/59), 100% (43/43) and 98% (100/102), respectively.

Conclusion: Vestibular ganglia may mimic intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas on a single-sequence T2W MRI. However, a fusiform shape and width <1.3 mm increases confidence in the diagnosis of ganglia. Identifying the vestibular ganglion on single-sequence T2W MRI studies may obviate the need for a contrast-enhanced MRI, reducing the risks of contrast administration, additional scanning time and cost.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imaging features
8
vestibular ganglion
8
intracanalicular schwannoma
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
vestibular ganglia
8
mri studies
8
diagnostic performance
8
vestibular schwannomas
8
vestibular
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!