Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent biologically enhanced patch augmentation repair for the treatment of revision massive rotator cuff tears.

Methods: Twenty-two patients who underwent arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair using a patch augmented with platelet-rich plasma and concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) for revision massive (≥2 tendons) rotator cuff tears from 2009 to 2014, with a minimum 1-year follow-up, were included in the study. In this procedure the medial side of the graft is secured to the rotator cuff tendon remaining medially. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test, and postoperative Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation scores were evaluated. To determine the clinical relevance of ASES scores, the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and the patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) thresholds were used. Clinical success or failure was defined based on whether the patient reached the SCB threshold. In the laboratory, cellular counting along with the concentration of connective tissue progenitor cells were performed on patch samples from the day of surgery. Scaffolds were processed histologically at days 0, 7,14, and 21 of culture.

Results: Patients had significant improvement in the Simple Shoulder Test (2.6 ± 3.0 vs 5.2 ± 4.2, P = .01), whereas improvement in pain scores was found to be nonsignificant (5.6 ± 2.5 vs 4.2 ± 3.4P = .11) at final follow-up. Mean ASES improved by Δ14.6 ± 33.4 points; however, this did not reach statistical significance (40.2 ± 21.6 vs 53.9 ± 31.4P = .10). With regards to ASES score, 45% of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference, 41% the SCB, and 32% reached or exceeded the PASS criteria. At 21 days, there was a significantly greater cell count in scaffolds from patients who had clinical success than those who were failures (P = .02).

Conclusions: Only 41% of patients undergoing biologically enhanced patch augmentation repair reached substantial clinical benefit, whereas 32% reached or exceeded the PASS criteria.

Level Of Evidence: Case Series: Level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotator cuff
20
biologically enhanced
12
enhanced patch
12
patch augmentation
12
augmentation repair
12
revision massive
12
clinical outcomes
8
massive rotator
8
cuff tears
8
patients underwent
8

Similar Publications

Background: So-called scores are a frequently used evaluation system in clinical examinations to assess the function or limitations of a joint such as the shoulder. However, research indicates that these general scores often have limited validity for specific patient groups, such as athletes. Known as a demanding patient population, athletes have unique needs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Tenotomy versus Tenodesis with Medium-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tear in the Elderly: A Retrospective Study.

Clin Interv Aging

January 2025

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.

Purpose: Shoulder arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears with simultaneous treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon has become increasingly accepted. However, the clinical outcomes between tenotomy and tenodesis remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of tenotomy and tenodesis combined with rotator cuff repair in elderly patients with medium-to-massive rotator cuff tears.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are well-known methods of treating glenohumeral arthritis, which often leads to posterior wear of the glenoid. This study compared minimum two-year outcome measures in patients treated with RSA and TSA for Walch B2 and B3 glenoids.

Methods: Thirty-eight shoulders underwent TSA and 40 shoulders underwent RSA by two fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at a tertiary referral center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a widely used 13-item shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measure for shoulder pain disorders. The English version of SPADI is easy to use and demonstrates excellent measurement properties for clinical and research settings.

Purpose: To translate and culturally adapt an Indonesian version of SPADI (SPADI-IDN) and then validate its use in Indonesian patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The use of large multi-institutional databases in rotator cuff repair (RCR) research is expanding, but these studies are observational and cannot establish causation. This study examines the prevalence of causal language in clinical RCR database studies published from 2013 to 2022.

Methods: Administrative database and clinical registry studies on RCR published in eight orthopaedic journals from 2013 to 2022 were systematically identified and graded by two reviewers for the presence, absence, or inconsistent use of causal language in both the title/abstract and the full text.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!