Described in the article are the results of treating a total of 44 patients who endured repeat operations for infection of aortofemoral bifurcation allografts over the period between 2001 and 2018. These patients had previously undergone reconstructive operations using various synthetic grafts for lower limb ischaemia on the background of lower-limb artery atherosclerosis and infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Infection of synthetic vascular allografts in these patients was observed both in the immediate and remote postoperative periods. The dominating infection in 70% of patients was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The main objective risk factors for infection of bifurcation grafts were found to be as follows: stage III-IV chronic lower limb ischaemia (according to the Fontaine-Pokrovsky classification), diabetes mellitus, and prior operations on lower-limb arteries. Two of the 44 patients were operated on for reinfection after repeat aortofemoral bypass grafting. 30% of patients underwent repeat surgery with symptoms of sepsis. After meticulous additional examination and preoperative preparation the patients were subjected to secondary simultaneous operation, i.e., removal of the synthetic aortofemoral bifurcation prosthesis and aortofemoral bifurcation autovenous repeat reconstruction (repeat bypass grafting) in situ. Aortofemoral bifurcation grafts were formed using superficial femoral veins from both legs. Four patients died in the immediate postoperative period. Other short-term complications included arrosive bleeding with or without sepsis, amputation of one leg due to graft limb thrombosis, and development of peritonitis resulting from perforation of the jejunum. In the remote period, patency of autovenous grafts was confirmed in 37 patients. Of long-term complications, mention should be made of the following: formation of aneurysms of distal anastomoses and thrombosis of one of the limbs of the autovenous graft. The patients were successfully operated on now using synthetic grafts in infection-free conditions. Hence, a method of surgical decision-making in patients with infected aortofemoral bifurcation grafts is the use of the technique of complete removal of the infected synthetic graft with simultaneous in situ replacement using autovenous grafts from superficial femoral veins, active pre- and postoperative antibiotic therapy. Such policy made it possible to decrease the mortality rate to 9%, with a limb-salvage rate of 97.5% and long-term graft patency rate amounting to 92.5%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.33529/ANGIO2020102DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aortofemoral bifurcation
24
patients
12
bifurcation grafts
12
patients infected
8
infected aortofemoral
8
synthetic grafts
8
lower limb
8
limb ischaemia
8
patients operated
8
bypass grafting
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study compares four surgical and endovascular techniques for treating aorto-iliac occlusive disease: Aortobifemoral bypass (AoBFB), axillobifemoral bypass (AxBFB), aorto-iliac kissing stents (KS), and covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB).
  • Eight patient-specific anatomies were analyzed using computational modeling to evaluate haemodynamic performance, focusing on pressure drop (ΔP), Time Average Wall Shear Stress (TAWSS), Oscillatory Shear Index (OSI), and Relative Residence Time (RRT) as indicators for thrombogenic risk.
  • Results show that AoBFB had the best
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Presented in the article is a clinical case report regarding successful treatment of a patient with infection of a vascular graft after bifurcation aortofemoral bypass grafting by means of partial removal of the graft's branch with extra-anatomical graft-to-femur prosthetic repair through the iliac wing. The patient was admitted 6 months after bifurcation aortofemoral bypass grafting with a purulent and ligature fistula, discharge in the inguinal area. The findings of computed tomography showed no infection of the central anastomosis in the retroperitoneal space, with however periprosthetic infection in the area of the distal branch and severe comorbid background, thus not allowing complete removal of the prosthesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Infection of arterial vascular grafts is a rare but utterly severe complication in vascular surgery. Therapeutic policy in patients with graft infection has not been standardized, to be determined individually. One of the variants of surgical treatment is considered to be repeat aortic repair using a cadaveric graft.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Presented in the article are advantages of various methods of treatment of periprosthetic infection which continues to be one of the most challenging problems in modern vascular surgery. We describe herein a clinical case report regarding a patient with late infection of a bifurcated aortofemoral bypass graft. The infectious complication manifested itself by a periprosthetic infiltrate in the area of the distal anastomosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Analysed herein are the results of treating a total of 17 patients presenting with pathology of the aorta and lower-limb arteries, who from 2010 to 2018 required redo interventions due to infection of a previously implanted synthetic vascular graft. At admission, 3 patients were diagnosed as having an open infected wound, 11 were found to have a fistula, 2 had a false aneurysm in the area of the distal anastomosis of the branch of the bifurcation aortofemoral prosthesis, and 1 had thrombosis of the branch of the prosthesis with evidence of infection. As redo surgery, 4 patients underwent subclavian-femoral bypass grafting, 2 were subjected to crossover iliac-femoral bypass grafting, 8 to unilateral iliac-femoral bypass grafting, 3 to loop endarterectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!