A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Preventing forgotten double J ureteral stents in a high-volume service medical center: An autoregistration monitoring system. | LitMetric

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of an autoregistration monitoring system (ARMS) for tracking the placement and removal of ureteral stents.

Methods: The system was designed to tie in closely with the billing system. Once a stent was used and charged, a stent "episode" was created in the ARMS. When the stent was removed and the charge for the procedure was issued, the stent episode for that stent was removed automatically. The ARMS identified stents which exceeded their deadline, generating an alarm until the stent was removed and the ARMS updated.

Results: A total of 10 105 patients with 12 440 stent episodes were registered in the ARMS between March 2010 and August 2018. Of the 10 105 patients, 8597 (85.07%) were automatically detected to have had their stents removed before their deadline. We contacted the 1508 (14.93%) patients whose stents were not registered as having been removed by their deadline, of whom 122 (1.21%) had undergone stent removal at other hospitals, 490 (4.85%) had died, and 875 (8.66%) knew that they had ureteral stents inserted and were urged to come back for stent removal. Twenty-one patients (0.21%) did not know that they had implanted stents. None of these 21 patients were urological patients, and they had stents placed during urological consultation in an operating room.

Conclusion: Our study showed that the ARMS reduced the manpower in tracking stent removal by 85.07% and that it was useful for detecting and preventing forgotten stents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000281DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stent removed
12
stent removal
12
stent
10
preventing forgotten
8
stents
8
ureteral stents
8
autoregistration monitoring
8
monitoring system
8
105 patients
8
removed deadline
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!