Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Twenty patients completed this randomized, controlled, blinded clinical trial comparing ridge preservation with a bioabsorbable polylactic acid membrane (PLA group) compared to an acellular dermal matrix membrane guided bone regeneration (ADMG group). An intrasocket corticocancellous allograft plus a facial overlay xenograft was used for both groups. Final crestal ridge width was significantly greater for the ADMG group ( < .05). Soft tissue thickness, conversely, was thicker for the PLA group. Vertical ridge height change increased significantly for the midbuccal site of the ADMG group. Histologic evaluation showed high percentages of vital bone for both groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.4120 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!