Clinicopathological evaluation of the donor area following autologous suction blister epithelial grafting vs Thiersch grafting in vitiligo patients: A preliminary study.

Surgical vitiligo treatment is suggested for recalcitrant small stable lesions. One of the limitations of this approach is the presence of large lesions. The donor site should be designed to be hidden without previous or present lesions; this limits donor sites. Aim of the study was to clinically and histopathologically evaluate donor areas 3 months and 1 year after Thiersch grafting (TG) and suction blister epithelial grafting (SBEG). Forty patients with stable vitiligo were equally divided into two groups before TG and SBEG. In each patient, the donor site was clinically and histopathologically evaluated after 3 months and 1 year. After 3 months in Group I, hyperpigmentation, mixed pigmentation with atrophic scarring, hyperpigmentation with hypertrophic scarring, erythema, and tough skin were detected in 10%, 50%, 10%, 10%, and 20% of cases, respectively. The condition improved with time leaving, leaving tough skin in all cases after 1 year. In Group II, hyperpigmentation was observed in all patients after 3 months and disappeared completely after 1 year. Histologically, biopsies taken 3 months after TG, showed increased basal pigmentation with dermal changes mimicking scar tissue in 92.5% of cases. Collagen homogenization of and fragmented elastic tissue were reported in all cases. Biopsies showed the same features after 1 year. In the SBEG group, biopsies revealed only basal hyperpigmentation that disappeared after 1 year in all patients. We concluded that SBEG is a scarless operation and regrafting from the same area can be performed. This is in contrast to TG, which is considered a scarring operation, and wherein the donor site cannot be reused for grafting.