AI Article Synopsis

  • Over 40% of global tuberculosis (TB) cases are clinically diagnosed without laboratory confirmation, leading to the widespread use of empirical antibiotic treatments—termed "trial-of-antibiotics"—which poses risks for antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
  • A systematic review found no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) supporting the effectiveness of this diagnostic approach, prompting the need for an RCT to evaluate its diagnostic value and impact on AMR.
  • The study involves a three-arm RCT in Malawi with adults experiencing cough, comparing azithromycin, amoxicillin, and no immediate antibiotic treatment, measuring clinical outcomes and the effect on AMR after treatment.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Over 40% of global tuberculosis case notifications are diagnosed clinically without mycobacteriological confirmation. Standard diagnostic algorithms include 'trial-of-antibiotics'-empirical antibiotic treatment given to mycobacteriology-negative individuals to treat infectious causes of symptoms other than tuberculosis, as a 'rule-out' diagnostic test for tuberculosis. Potentially 26.5 million such antibiotic courses/year are prescribed globally for the 5.3 million/year mycobacteriology-negative patients, making trial-of-antibiotics the most common tuberculosis diagnostic, and a global-scale risk for antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Our systematic review found no randomised controlled trial (RCT) to support use of trial-of-antibiotic. The RCT aims to determine the diagnostic and clinical value and AMR consequences of trial-of-antibiotics.

Methods And Analysis: A three-arm, open-label, RCT randomising (1:1:1) Malawian adults (≥18 years) seeking primary care for cough into: (a) azithromycin 500 mg one time per day for 3 days or (b) amoxicillin 1 g three times per day for 5 days or (c) standard-of-care (no immediate antibiotic). We will perform mycobacteriology tests (microscopy, Xpert MTB/RIF (/rifampicin) and culture) at baseline. We will use audiocomputer-assisted self-interview to assess clinical improvement at day 8. First primary outcome will be proportion of patients reporting day 8 improvement out of those with negative mycobacteriology (specificity). Second primary outcome will be day 29 incidence of a composite endpoint of either death or hospitalisation or missed tuberculosis diagnosis. To determine AMR impact we compare proportion of resistant nasopharyngeal isolates on day 29. 400 mycobacteriology-negative participants/arm will be required to detect a ≥10% absolute difference in diagnostic specificity with 80% power. We will estimate measures of effect by comparing outcomes in antibiotic arms (combined and individually) to standard-of-care.

Ethics And Dissemination: The study has been reviewed and approved by Malawi College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) Research Ethics Committee and Regional Committee for Health and Research Ethics - Norway, and Malawi Pharmacy, Medicines and Poisons Board. We will present abstracts at relevant conferences, and prepare a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial Registration Number: The clinical trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03545373.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7170647PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033999DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

randomised controlled
8
clinical trial
8
day days
8
primary outcome
8
outcome will
8
ethics committee
8
will
7
day
6
tuberculosis
5
diagnostic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!