What types of real-world evidence studies do U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions?

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Published: October 2020

Purpose: To examine the RWE U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions.

Methods: We used the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database to identify specialty drug coverage decisions (n = 7267) issued by 17 large commercial health plans. We categorized the clinical evidence plans cited in these coverage decisions (n = 5227) as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RWE studies, and other clinical studies (studies other than RCT or RWE study). We categorized RWE studies with respect to study type, for example, case series, studies based on medical records, and so on. We compared the frequency that plans cited different categories of RWE, cited RWE for different diseases, and cited RWE for drugs on the market for different time periods.

Results: RWE comprised 16% of cited clinical studies. Health plans cited RWE with different frequencies (5%-31% of the cited clinical evidence). Overall, plans cited RWE categorized as medical records most often (26% of cited RWE studies). Plans varied in the frequency they cited different RWE categories. Plans most frequently cited RWE for gastroenterological diseases (35% of clinical study citations) and least frequently for respiratory diseases (11% of clinical study citations). Plans cited RWE more for drugs that have long been on the market.

Conclusions: Health plans varied with respect to the number and types of RWE studies they cited in their specialty drug coverage decisions. Plans cited RWE more often for some diseases than others, and cited more RWE for older drugs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.4992DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cited rwe
40
plans cited
24
health plans
20
specialty drug
20
rwe
17
drug coverage
16
rwe studies
16
cited
15
commercial health
12
plans
12

Similar Publications

Background: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are approved in Europe as preventive treatment of migraine in patients with at least four monthly migraine days. Migraine gives rise to direct healthcare expenditures, but most of the economic burden of migraine is socioeconomic. Evidence on the socioeconomic implications of CGRP-mAbs is, however, limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Because health plans each issue their own policies, drug coverage can vary. This variation can result in patients having unequal access to treatment. In this study, we evaluate commercial health plans' coverage policies for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for patients with anemia resulting from chronic kidney disease (CKD).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Safety and Effectiveness of Tenofovir Alafenamide in Usual Clinical Practice Confirms Results of Clinical Trials: TARGET-HBV.

Dig Dis Sci

June 2022

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 3912 Taubman Center, SPC 5362, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Background: Nucleos(t)ide analogues, with a proven record of safety and efficacy, have been the therapy of choice for over a decade for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The approval of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) in 2016 provided an additional treatment option.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients treated with TAF in usual clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There has been growing interest in using real-world evidence (RWE) for health technology assessment (HTA) in the United States. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is an independent U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Payers are faced with making coverage and reimbursement decisions based on the best available evidence. Often these decisions apply to patient populations, provider networks, and care settings not typically studied in clinical trials. Treatment effectiveness evidence is increasingly available from electronic health records, registries, and administrative claims.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!