A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version. | LitMetric

Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.

HNO

Audiology Department and CI Centre CICERO Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic, University Hospital Erlangen, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Published: August 2020

Background: Improvement of speech perception in quiet is an important goal of hearing aid provision. In practice, results are highly variable. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between type and extent of hearing loss (audiogram type), maximum word recognition score, and aided speech perception.

Materials And Methods: Pure tone and speech audiometric data of 740 ears in 370 patients were reviewed. All subjects visited our hearing center for hearing aid evaluation between 2012 and 2017. The maximum word recognition score (WRS) and the monosyllabic speech recognition score with hearing aids, WRS(HA) were analyzed for 10 different standard audiogram types.

Results: The WRS(HA) with hearing aids for different degrees of hearing loss is, within error boundaries, comparable to previous investigations and shows a difference of 10-20 percentage points to the WRS. This difference tends to be larger for flat and moderately sloping audiograms compared to steep-sloping audiograms. The ratio WRS(HA)/WRS can be interpreted as an efficiency factor for hearing aid provision, since it relates speech recognition with hearing aids to the maximally achievable information carrying capacity of the hearing impaired.

Conclusion: The expectation regarding hearing aid provision has to be adjusted according to maximum word recognition score, the derived quality measures, degree of hearing loss, and audiogram type.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7403172PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-020-00843-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearing aids
16
hearing aid
16
recognition score
16
hearing
13
speech recognition
12
aid provision
12
hearing loss
12
maximum word
12
word recognition
12
recognition hearing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!