AI Article Synopsis

  • - The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and other professional organizations developed updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for bariatric surgery, following a standardized protocol and incorporating new evidence from 2013 onwards.
  • - The updated CPGs cover various topics, including a focus on chronic disease models related to obesity, the use of algorithms for decision-making, and the introduction of new bariatric procedures, resulting in 85 recommendations that vary in evidence quality.
  • - The guidelines conclude that bariatric surgery is a safe intervention for obese patients and emphasize the need for evidence-based decision-making and a collaborative healthcare approach, particularly addressing nutrition and metabolism.

Article Abstract

Objective: The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

Methods: Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

Results: New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

Conclusions: Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.22719DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

american society
16
bariatric procedures
12
bariatric surgery
12
clinical practice
8
practice guidelines
8
american association
8
association clinical
8
obesity society
8
society metabolic
8
metabolic bariatric
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!