The aim of our study was to explore risk factors of cage nonunion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).295 patients underwent ACDF in our hospital between Jan. 2014 and Jan. 2017. Of them, 277 patients suffered cage union (union group, UG) after 6-month follow-up and 18 did not (nonunion group, NG). We collected possible factors including gender, history of smoking, alcohol, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, body mass index, diagnose, and preoperative visual analog scale -neck, visual analog scale-arm, neck disability index (NDI) and Japanese Orthorpaedic Association, surgical duration, blood loss, fusion levels, superior fusion segment, angle of C2-C7, range of motion for C2-C7, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope. We performed univariable and multivariable analysis to compare data in 2 groups.The rate of cage nonunion after ACDF was 6.1% (18 of 295) in our study. The outcome of univariable analysis showed that age (63.5 ± 10.1), angle of C2-C7 (18.0 ± 4.6), range of motion of C2-C7 (32.5 ± 7.7), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (17.9 ± 4.3) and T1 slope (22.1 ± 5.3) were higher in NG than these (59.4 ± 9.2, 16.2 ± 4.5, 30.2 ± 6.9,16.1 ± 4.0, 20.9 ± 4.9) in UG. Additionally, patients with osteoporosis had markedly higher rate of cage nonunion after ACDF than those without. What's more, the multivariable analysis implied the same results with univariable analysis.Many factors could predict cage nonunion after ACDF. Cervical sagittal parameters play an important role in cage nonunion after ACDF. We hope that we can provide some guidance for spine surgeon before performing ACDF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220066PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019550DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cage nonunion
24
nonunion acdf
16
risk factors
8
factors cage
8
nonunion anterior
8
anterior cervical
8
cervical discectomy
8
discectomy fusion
8
visual analog
8
angle c2-c7
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of minimally invasive PCF using an interfacet joint fusion cage.

Methods: The inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent a PCF using an interfacet device (Cavux, Providence Medical Technology Inc.) at a single institution and were at least 6 months postoperative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Awake, endoscopic spinal fusion has been utilized as an ultra-minimally invasive surgery technique to accomplish the goals of spinal fixation, fusion, and disc height restoration. While many techniques exist for this approach, this series represents a single institution's experience with a large cohort and the evolution of this method.

Methods: The medical records of a consecutive series of 400 patients treated over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Septic nonunion after vertebral fusion can cause significant disability, often requiring surgery, bone fixation, and antibiotics for management.
  • - A novel treatment was applied in a case involving a 31-year-old man who had severe back pain and developed a septic nonunion after multiple surgical fusions; a scapula tip free flap was used to reconstruct his L5-S1 vertebral defect.
  • - The patient's surgery, which included connecting blood vessels through an intra-abdominal method, was successful, leading to a pain-free recovery and fusion at the defect site after one year, highlighting the scapula tip flap as a potential option for similar spinal reconstructions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The need for an artificial scaffold in very large bone defects is clear, not only to limit the risk of graft harvesting but also to improve clinical success. The use of custom osteoconductive scaffolds made from biodegradable polyester and ceramics can be a valuable patient-friendly option, especially in case of a concomitant infection. Multiple types of scaffolds for the Masquelet procedure (MP) are available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advances in implants and bone graft types for lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Biomater Sci

September 2024

Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • The prevalence of spinal disorders increases the need for advanced treatments, particularly 360° lumbar interbody fusion, which uses specialized materials to assist in spinal stability and enhance fusion.
  • Despite advancements, a 10% rate of non-union remains, leading to poor patient outcomes and higher healthcare costs, highlighting the need for better solutions.
  • Innovations in implant materials, like titanium and PEEK, along with new bone graft substitutes, including bioglass and growth factors, are being explored to improve spinal surgeries and reduce complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!