Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Comparative evaluation of front loading sputum microscopic approach versus standard Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) spot morning approach for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Methods: All cases coming to the designated microscopy centre, Microbiology in this tertiary care centre with presumptive diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled for the study population after taking informed consent. The sputum sample collection, staining and reporting were done according to standard RNTCP guidelines.
Results: This study shows the probable non-inferiority of the frontloading sputum smear microscopy over the standard RNTCP approach.
Conclusion: The front loading smear microscopy could be considered a suitable alternate to standard RNTCP approach in an area with high drop out during diagnostic testing pathway.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtb.2019.08.009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!