The Evaluation of a Two-Year Outcome of Intravitreal Conbercept versus Ranibizumab for Pathological Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization.

: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the 24-month follow-up results of intravitreal conbercept with ranibizumab in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV), secondary to pathological myopia (PM). : Fifty-nine patients' 64 eyes with pathological myopic CNV were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-one eyes underwent conbercept treatment (group C) and 33 eyes underwent ranibizumab treatment (group R), respectively. No patients have received any treatment before. The main outcome of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) uses an international standard visual acuity chart and is converted to the minimum resolution logarithm (LogMAR) visual acuity. : There were no significant differences between the two groups at the baseline statisticlly. At 24 months, the mean logMAR BCVA of group C increased from 0.95 ± 0.54 to 0.58 ± 0.39 ( < .001) and the mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 280.97 ± 62.69 μm to 242.35 ± 90.39 μm ( = .033). The mean logMAR BCVA of group R increased from 0.86 ± 0.40 to 0.54 ± 0.28 ( < .001) and the mean CMT was reduced from 303.58 ± 61.95 μm to 251.82 ± 84.74 μm ( = .005). There was no significant difference in logMAR BCVA and CMT between the two groups ( = .962, = .667, respectively). The mean number of injections was 3.94 ± 1.88 in group C and 4.06 ± 1.82 in group R ( = .788). During the follow-up period, no ocular complications and systemic adverse reactions were observed. : Similar visual acuity and improved morphology were achieved in both groups. The two drugs were also found to be safe and effective in the treatment of pathological myopic CNV.