Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the standard of care for cervical cancer. Hybrid intracavitary/interstitial applicators for bulky tumor (high-risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] > 30 cc) dose escalation is recommended in the EMBRACE II trial. The value of hybrid applicators for smaller HR-CTV (< 30 cc) in organ at risk (OAR) sparing is less certain.

Material And Methods: Twenty-seven patients with FIGO stage I-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation and MRI-based brachytherapy using conventional tandem and ring (TR) applicators were re-planned using virtual needles. They were then summed with the external beam dose to evaluate target coverage and OAR dose using EQD summation. Target and OAR dose with/without hybrid applicator use were compared.

Results: Eighty-one percent had HR-CTV volumes < 30 cc, for which, hybrid TR applicators had significantly lower mean D to all OARs without differences in target coverage. For HR-CTV < 30 cc, the bladder and rectal OAR goals per EMBRACE II were exceeded in significantly fewer patients with the hybrid TR applicators. No significant difference was found in the sigmoid D dose goal.

Conclusions: In small volume tumors (< 30 cc), hybrid applicators may offer improved OAR sparing compared with conventional tandem and ring applicators, and may increase the proportion of patients meeting EMBRACE II OAR goals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7073346PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2020.93515DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hybrid applicators
16
tandem ring
12
ring applicators
12
cervical cancer
12
applicators
8
organ risk
8
small volume
8
oar sparing
8
conventional tandem
8
target coverage
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!