Previous research has identified a number of issues arising at all stages of the animal law enforcement process. These issues contribute to an enforcement gap between the written law, as it relates to the penalties laid out in statutes, and the reality of the animal law justice system. This paper identifies and investigates the contributors to this gap. The identified factors discussed are (1) the role of the public in reporting animal cruelty, (2) the ambiguity of the language used in animal welfare legislation, (3) the nature of enforcement authorities, and (4) the role of the courts. Thus, the causes of the enforcement gap are multifactorial, derived from all stages of the enforcement process. Further research on the enforcement model and public education, in addition to debate on legislative reforms, will be needed to address this gap.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142490PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030482DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enforcement gap
12
reality animal
8
animal welfare
8
enforcement
8
law enforcement
8
animal law
8
enforcement process
8
animal
5
gap
5
explaining gap
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!