3.139.69.53=3.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=32168914&retmode=xml&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b49083.139.69.53=3.1
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&term=electrokinetic+remediation&datetype=edat&usehistory=y&retmax=5&tool=pubfacts&email=info@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908 Analysis and Optimization of Mn Removal from Contaminated Solid Matrixes by Electrokinetic Remediation. | LitMetric

Analysis and Optimization of Mn Removal from Contaminated Solid Matrixes by Electrokinetic Remediation.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

BiotecnIA, Chemical Engineering, University of Vigo, Rua Maxwell s/n, Building Fundicion, 36310 Vigo, Spain.

Published: March 2020

Electrokinetic remediation is a useful technique for the removal of ionic contaminants in soils, sediments, sludges, and other solid porous matrixes. The efficiency of metal removal and the electricity consumption in the electrokinetic treatment of soils largely depend on electric and physicochemical conditions. This study analyzes the electrokinetic treatment of Mn contaminated kaolinite clay specimen and the influence of voltage, current intensity, moisture content, pH, and facilitating agents on metal removal and energy consumption. The objective of this study is to identify the influence of the typical variables used in electrokinetic remediation. The results showed that the operation at constant voltage or constant current intensity were equivalent in terms of metal removal and energy consumption, as long as the electric field intensity was kept low to minimize the consumption in parallel electrochemical reactions, especially the electrolysis of water. The moisture content had a significant influence on the Mn removal. Moisture content higher that 50 percent resulted in very effective Mn removal as compared with kaolinite specimens with lower moisture. The control of pH in the electrolyte solutions and the addition of facilitating agents (organic acids) enhanced the removal of Mn but increased the electric energy cost. Overall, the best conditions for Mn removal involved low to moderate electric potential difference (10 to 30 V), the use of citric acid as the facilitating agent, and the pH control in the cathode at a slightly acid pH. The electrokinetic treatment of a sludge from a water treatment plant contaminated with Mn was effective when pH control on the cathode was used. Mn and various metals (66% of Mn, 30% of Cu, 56% of Zn, 21% Sr, and 21% of Fe) were removed with moderate electricity and acid consumption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143211PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061820DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrokinetic remediation
12
metal removal
12
electrokinetic treatment
12
moisture content
12
removal
9
current intensity
8
facilitating agents
8
removal energy
8
energy consumption
8
control cathode
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!